{"id":100811,"date":"2025-01-17T11:48:50","date_gmt":"2025-01-17T19:48:50","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/xira.com\/p\/?p=100811"},"modified":"2025-01-17T11:48:50","modified_gmt":"2025-01-17T19:48:50","slug":"state-appellate-court-rejects-reasoning-for-attorneys-removal-from-conservatorship","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/xira.com\/p\/2025\/01\/17\/state-appellate-court-rejects-reasoning-for-attorneys-removal-from-conservatorship\/","title":{"rendered":"State Appellate Court Rejects Reasoning for Attorney’s Removal From Conservatorship"},"content":{"rendered":"

The appeals court concluded the probate court abused its discretion in disqualifying private counsel based on the determination that the plaintiff was incapable of hiring private counsel. The court concluded the record didn’t support the conclusion because the plaintiff wasn’t the one to hire the counsel.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>\u00a0\"\"<\/a>\u00a0\"\"<\/a>\u00a0\"\"<\/a>\u00a0\"\"<\/a>\u00a0\"\"<\/a>\u00a0\u00a0<\/div>\n

The appeals court concluded the probate court abused its discretion in disqualifying private counsel based on the determination that the plaintiff was incapable of hiring private counsel. The court concluded the record didn’t support the conclusion because the plaintiff wasn’t the one to hire the counsel.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>\u00a0\"\"<\/a>\u00a0\"\"<\/a>\u00a0\"\"<\/a>\u00a0\"\"<\/a>\u00a0\"\"<\/a>\u00a0\u00a0<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The appeals court concluded the probate court abused its discretion in disqualifying private counsel based on the determination that the plaintiff was incapable of hiring private counsel. The court concluded the record didn’t support the conclusion because the plaintiff wasn’t the one to hire the counsel. \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 The appeals court concluded the probate court abused […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":0,"featured_media":100812,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[23,17],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-100811","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-law-com","category-legal_matters"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/xira.com\/p\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/legal-news-GPD53r.jpeg?fit=767%2C633&ssl=1","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/xira.com\/p\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/100811","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/xira.com\/p\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/xira.com\/p\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/xira.com\/p\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=100811"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/xira.com\/p\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/100811\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":100827,"href":"https:\/\/xira.com\/p\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/100811\/revisions\/100827"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/xira.com\/p\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/100812"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/xira.com\/p\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=100811"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/xira.com\/p\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=100811"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/xira.com\/p\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=100811"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}