{"id":119920,"date":"2025-05-21T16:48:06","date_gmt":"2025-05-22T00:48:06","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/xira.com\/p\/2025\/05\/21\/judge-ho-indulges-in-furious-rage-wank-over-aea-deportations\/"},"modified":"2025-05-21T16:48:06","modified_gmt":"2025-05-22T00:48:06","slug":"judge-ho-indulges-in-furious-rage-wank-over-aea-deportations","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/xira.com\/p\/2025\/05\/21\/judge-ho-indulges-in-furious-rage-wank-over-aea-deportations\/","title":{"rendered":"Judge Ho Indulges In Furious Rage Wank Over AEA Deportations"},"content":{"rendered":"
\"\"
(via YouTube)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

Yesterday, Judge James Ho had what can only be described as a public tantrum<\/a> on the public docket. That\u2019s not exactly out of character for the most intemperate jurist on the Fifth (and most intemperate) Circuit. But in a novel twist, this time he was screaming directly at the Supreme Court for daring to overturn his verdict to afford \u201cspecial treatment \u2026 to certain favored litigants like members of Tren de Aragua.\u201d Indirectly, he was screaming at the White House, in hopes that the president will think of him fondly when and if a vacancy opens up at the Supreme Court.<\/p>\n

The excuse for these histrionics was one of the many lawsuits spawned by President Trump\u2019s invocation of the Alien Enemies Act (AEA) on the theory that the government of Venezuela is invading the US, with street gangs acting as shock troops. This theory has been refuted not once<\/a> but twice<\/a> by the president\u2019s own intelligence agencies, leading to a vow to prosecute leakers<\/a>, but no change in strategy. <\/p>\n

After SCOTUS decreed that detainees could only challenge AEA deportations in habeas, judges in Colorado, New York, and the Southern and Western Districts of Texas issued relief, barring DHS from summarily deporting men to a hellish gulag in El Salvador. But the government lucked out in the Northern District of Texas with Judge James Hendrix, a Trump appointee who refused<\/a> to certify the detainees as a class or even to order<\/a> the government to comply with the Supreme Court\u2019s order<\/a> that \u201cnotice must be afforded within a reasonable time and in such a manner as will allow them to actually seek habeas relief in the proper venue before such removal occurs.\u201d The government\u2019s position is that notice provided in English, less than 24 hours before removal, with no mention of how<\/em> the detainee might challenge the deportation is plenty good enough.<\/p>\n

Matters came to a head on the weekend of April 18 when the government, having gotten tacit permission from Judge Hendrix, began handing out these inadequate notices to prisoners at the Bluebonnet Detention Center, informing detainees that they would shortly be renditioned to El Salvador. The ACLU raced into court at 12:34 a.m. Friday morning with an emergency motion for TRO<\/a>, which Judge Hendrix ignored. Twelve hours later, the plaintiffs asked<\/a> the court to rule by 1:30 p.m., preventing the imminent departure of their clients beyond the court\u2019s reach, or at least giving them something to appeal to the Fifth Circuit or SCOTUS. Still nothing<\/em>.<\/p>\n

Deeming this a constructive denial, they appealed anyway. The Fifth Circuit gave them the back of the hand<\/a>, scolding the plaintiffs for casting aspersions on \u201cthe diligence and ability of the respected district judge in this case to act expeditiously when circumstances warrant.\u201d At 1:30 a.m. on Saturday the 19th, the Supreme Court leapt in<\/a> with a per curiam order directing the government \u201cnot to remove any member of the putative class of detainees from the United States until further order of this Court.\u201d Two days later, Justice Alito released a howling dissent<\/a>, joined by Justice Thomas, agreeing with Judge Hendrix that there could be no class certification in habeas and adopting the Fifth Circuit panel\u2019s framing of the plaintiffs\u2019 motion as giving Judge Hendrix just 42 minutes to respond, rather than more than 14 hours.<\/p>\n

On May 16, the Supreme Court issued another per curiam order<\/a> rubbishing the Fifth Circuit\u2019s reasoning and noting that of course<\/em> Judge Hendrix\u2019s dithering even as detainees were being loaded onto buses amounted to a constructive denial. <\/p>\n

The Court found that the government\u2019s notice clearly did not provide due process to the detainees: \u201cUnder these circumstances, notice roughly 24 hours before removal, devoid of information about how to exercise due process rights to contest that removal, surely does not pass muster.\u201d<\/p>\n

The order barred deportations from the Northern District under the AEA, ruling that \u201cwe need not decide whether a class should be certified as to the detainees\u2019 due process claims in order to temporarily enjoin the Government from removing putative class members while the question of what notice is due is adjudicated.\u201d <\/p>\n

Once again, Justices Alito and Thomas voiced their vehement dissent.<\/p>\n

The case is now GVR-ed to the Fifth Circuit with the instruction to \u201caddress (1) all the normal preliminary injunction factors, including likelihood of success on the merits, as to the named plaintiffs\u2019 underlying habeas claims that the AEA does not authorize their removal pursuant to the President\u2019s March 14, 2025, Proclamation, and (2) the issue of what notice is due, as to the putative class\u2019s due process claims against summary removal.\u201d<\/p>\n

And that\u2019s how this case wound up back on Judge Ho\u2019s (presumably spittle flecked) desk. <\/p>\n

\u201cIt is not the role of the judiciary to check the excesses of the other branches, any more than it\u2019s our role to check the excesses of any other American citizen,\u201d he wrote, seemingly so overcome by phlegm that he forgot that his IRL job \u2014 and one that he pursued vigorously between 2021 and 2024! \u2014 is to serve as a check on the legislative and executive branches. Maybe one of his clerks can play him the School House Rock video to jog his memory!<\/p>\n

\n
\n<\/div>\n<\/figure>\n

\u201cI write to state my sincere concerns about how the district judge as well as the President and other officials have been treated in this case,\u201d he wrote, seemingly overcome with agita over the government\u2019s inability to immediately cast human beings who have committed no crime into indefinite detention in an infamously dangerous prison. \u201cI worry that the disrespect they have been shown will not inspire continued respect for the judiciary, without which we cannot long function.\u201d<\/p>\n

Judge Ho indulged in an extended lecture on CLOCKS, HOW DO THEY WORK, insisting that poor, overworked Judge Hendrix was only given 42 minutes to respond to the impudent plaintiffs. <\/p>\n

\u201cWe seem to have forgotten that this is a district court\u2014not a Denny\u2019s,\u201d he huffed indignantly. \u201cThis is the first time I\u2019ve ever heard anyone suggest that district judges have a duty to check their dockets at all hours of the night, just in case a party decides to file a motion.\u201d<\/p>\n

The judge went on to insist on the sacred right of the government to take 24 hours to respond to any motion, during which time they could moot it by removing all members of the class from the district. And then, perhaps cognizant of the president\u2019s short attention span, Judge Ho finished by heaping scorn on both Barack Obama and Bill Clinton.<\/p>\n

And then, having released his judicial fluids, he pulled his robe back over his knees. <\/p>\n

\u201cThe Supreme Court has reversed our unanimous judgment,\u201d he sighed. \u201cSo this appeal must now proceed. I accordingly concur.\u201d<\/p>\n

He concurs \u2026 with the order to expedite the case as directed by the Supreme Court. <\/p>\n

SUBTLE.<\/p>\n

\n

Liz Dye<\/a>\u00a0lives in Baltimore where she produces the Law and Chaos\u00a0substack<\/a>\u00a0and\u00a0podcast<\/a>.<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

The post Judge Ho Indulges In Furious Rage Wank Over AEA Deportations<\/a> appeared first on Above the Law<\/a>.<\/p>\n

\"\"
(via YouTube)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

Yesterday, Judge James Ho had what can only be described as a public tantrum<\/a> on the public docket. That\u2019s not exactly out of character for the most intemperate jurist on the Fifth (and most intemperate) Circuit. But in a novel twist, this time he was screaming directly at the Supreme Court for daring to overturn his verdict to afford \u201cspecial treatment \u2026 to certain favored litigants like members of Tren de Aragua.\u201d Indirectly, he was screaming at the White House, in hopes that the president will think of him fondly when and if a vacancy opens up at the Supreme Court.<\/p>\n

The excuse for these histrionics was one of the many lawsuits spawned by President Trump\u2019s invocation of the Alien Enemies Act (AEA) on the theory that the government of Venezuela is invading the US, with street gangs acting as shock troops. This theory has been refuted not once<\/a> but twice<\/a> by the president\u2019s own intelligence agencies, leading to a vow to prosecute leakers<\/a>, but no change in strategy. <\/p>\n

After SCOTUS decreed that detainees could only challenge AEA deportations in habeas, judges in Colorado, New York, and the Southern and Western Districts of Texas issued relief, barring DHS from summarily deporting men to a hellish gulag in El Salvador. But the government lucked out in the Northern District of Texas with Judge James Hendrix, a Trump appointee who refused<\/a> to certify the detainees as a class or even to order<\/a> the government to comply with the Supreme Court\u2019s order<\/a> that \u201cnotice must be afforded within a reasonable time and in such a manner as will allow them to actually seek habeas relief in the proper venue before such removal occurs.\u201d The government\u2019s position is that notice provided in English, less than 24 hours before removal, with no mention of how<\/em> the detainee might challenge the deportation is plenty good enough.<\/p>\n

Matters came to a head on the weekend of April 18 when the government, having gotten tacit permission from Judge Hendrix, began handing out these inadequate notices to prisoners at the Bluebonnet Detention Center, informing detainees that they would shortly be renditioned to El Salvador. The ACLU raced into court at 12:34 a.m. Friday morning with an emergency motion for TRO<\/a>, which Judge Hendrix ignored. Twelve hours later, the plaintiffs asked<\/a> the court to rule by 1:30 p.m., preventing the imminent departure of their clients beyond the court\u2019s reach, or at least giving them something to appeal to the Fifth Circuit or SCOTUS. Still nothing<\/em>.<\/p>\n

Deeming this a constructive denial, they appealed anyway. The Fifth Circuit gave them the back of the hand<\/a>, scolding the plaintiffs for casting aspersions on \u201cthe diligence and ability of the respected district judge in this case to act expeditiously when circumstances warrant.\u201d At 1:30 a.m. on Saturday the 19th, the Supreme Court leapt in<\/a> with a per curiam order directing the government \u201cnot to remove any member of the putative class of detainees from the United States until further order of this Court.\u201d Two days later, Justice Alito released a howling dissent<\/a>, joined by Justice Thomas, agreeing with Judge Hendrix that there could be no class certification in habeas and adopting the Fifth Circuit panel\u2019s framing of the plaintiffs\u2019 motion as giving Judge Hendrix just 42 minutes to respond, rather than more than 14 hours.<\/p>\n

On May 16, the Supreme Court issued another per curiam order<\/a> rubbishing the Fifth Circuit\u2019s reasoning and noting that of course<\/em> Judge Hendrix\u2019s dithering even as detainees were being loaded onto buses amounted to a constructive denial. <\/p>\n

The Court found that the government\u2019s notice clearly did not provide due process to the detainees: \u201cUnder these circumstances, notice roughly 24 hours before removal, devoid of information about how to exercise due process rights to contest that removal, surely does not pass muster.\u201d<\/p>\n

The order barred deportations from the Northern District under the AEA, ruling that \u201cwe need not decide whether a class should be certified as to the detainees\u2019 due process claims in order to temporarily enjoin the Government from removing putative class members while the question of what notice is due is adjudicated.\u201d <\/p>\n

Once again, Justices Alito and Thomas voiced their vehement dissent.<\/p>\n

The case is now GVR-ed to the Fifth Circuit with the instruction to \u201caddress (1) all the normal preliminary injunction factors, including likelihood of success on the merits, as to the named plaintiffs\u2019 underlying habeas claims that the AEA does not authorize their removal pursuant to the President\u2019s March 14, 2025, Proclamation, and (2) the issue of what notice is due, as to the putative class\u2019s due process claims against summary removal.\u201d<\/p>\n

And that\u2019s how this case wound up back on Judge Ho\u2019s (presumably spittle flecked) desk. <\/p>\n

\u201cIt is not the role of the judiciary to check the excesses of the other branches, any more than it\u2019s our role to check the excesses of any other American citizen,\u201d he wrote, seemingly so overcome by phlegm that he forgot that his IRL job \u2014 and one that he pursued vigorously between 2021 and 2024! \u2014 is to serve as a check on the legislative and executive branches. Maybe one of his clerks can play him the School House Rock video to jog his memory!<\/p>\n