{"id":123291,"date":"2025-06-18T14:03:15","date_gmt":"2025-06-18T22:03:15","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/xira.com\/p\/2025\/06\/18\/lexisnexis-harvey-announce-partnership\/"},"modified":"2025-06-18T14:03:15","modified_gmt":"2025-06-18T22:03:15","slug":"lexisnexis-harvey-announce-partnership","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/xira.com\/p\/2025\/06\/18\/lexisnexis-harvey-announce-partnership\/","title":{"rendered":"LexisNexis &amp; Harvey Announce Partnership"},"content":{"rendered":"<figure class=\"wp-block-image alignright size-large is-resized\"><img data-recalc-dims=\"1\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\" width=\"620\" height=\"413\" src=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/abovethelaw.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/4\/2024\/03\/technology-785742_1280-1-620x413.jpg?resize=620%2C413&#038;ssl=1\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-86459\" title=\"\"><figcaption><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p><em>What did you do during the data wars, kid?<\/em><\/p>\n<p>That\u2019s more or less how someone in the far-flung future will talk about legal technology in 2025. Or we\u2019ll all be driven extinct by SkyNet. One or the other. <\/p>\n<p>As generative AI continues its march into the legal workflow, the flurry of press releases increasingly focus on data access. At the risk of oversimplifying the market, <a href=\"https:\/\/abovethelaw.com\/2024\/07\/generative-ai-what-if-this-is-as-good-as-it-gets\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener nofollow\">advancements in the underlying algorithms are going to stagnate<\/a> and providers have already announced their investment in building better guardrails so the next logical leap for the technology is pairing it with better data. And so that\u2019s the current scramble.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.harvey.ai\/?utm_source=google&amp;utm_medium=cpc&amp;utm_campaign=brand&amp;utm_term=harvey%20ai&amp;gad_source=1&amp;gad_campaignid=21880900257&amp;gbraid=0AAAAA-XoO5300YE0yH-XJtw9HARY0hdOV&amp;gclid=CjwKCAjwx8nCBhAwEiwA_z__06VOM_sSuDVoKlhv5xG5iVPd0s1IlLGptYUEryzDrddY607mkMKQHhoCYHIQAvD_BwE\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener nofollow\">Harvey<\/a> is an AI platform designed for legal professionals, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.lexisnexis.com\/en-us\/gateway.page\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener nofollow\">LexisNexis<\/a> is a vast repository of data and years of categorization and curation\u2026 <a href=\"https:\/\/theyfightcrime.org\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener nofollow\">they fight crime!<\/a><\/p>\n<p>In all seriousness, a while back, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.lawnext.com\/2024\/05\/harvey-ai-to-move-out-of-early-access-phase-release-more-affordable-versions-of-its-custom-ai-models.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener nofollow\">Harvey wanted to build a legal research solution<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/abovethelaw.com\/2025\/01\/lexisnexis-ushers-in-new-era-for-legal-ai\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener nofollow\">LexisNexis worked on an AI solution<\/a>. Now they\u2019re joining forces.<\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow\">\n<p>Within Harvey, customers can ask LexisNexis Prot\u00e9g\u00e9\u2122 to receive comprehensive, trusted AI answers grounded in the LexisNexis collection of U.S. case law and statutes, validated through Shepard\u2019s<sup>\u00ae<\/sup> Citations. Harvey users can ask complex legal questions in natural language and receive citation-supported answers from primary sources of law, refine their queries through follow-up questions, and seamlessly continue their research. Answers are generated using LexisNexis fine-tuned models within a proprietary infrastructure that anchors responses in legal content, metadata, and case law relationships, powered by Shepard\u2019s<sup>\u00ae<\/sup> Knowledge Graph and Point of Law Graph technology.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>Now Harvey users have the data and LexisNexis can deliver its product through a platform delivering AI to lawyers across use cases.<\/p>\n<p>Why isn\u2019t this just an acquisition like when Thomson Reuters bought Casetext? Unclear. The many tentacled LexisNexis corporate octopus has money in Harvey so it wouldn\u2019t be crazy to bring it all under one roof. And despite the alliance talk, it seems as though this will eventually create redundancies. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.artificiallawyer.com\/2025\/06\/18\/lexisnexis-harvey-announce-alliance-will-share-legal-data\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener nofollow\">Artificial Lawyer asked that question outright<\/a> and was told by LexisNexis North America, UK, and Ireland CEO Sean Fitzpatrick, \u201cWho knows where this will go?\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Pretty sure the answer is some kind of merger. <\/p>\n<p>The deal also includes a tease for some workflows getting the robo-treatment:<\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow\">\n<p>Harvey and LexisNexis will also develop sophisticated legal workflows built on the latest generative AI technology. These co-developed workflows will initially include:<\/p>\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Motion to Dismiss Workflow:<\/strong> Generates high-quality Motion to Dismiss arguments and related client communications with legal research content from LexisNexis<\/li>\n<li><strong>Motion for Summary Judgment Workflow:<\/strong> Automates key steps in drafting a Motion for Summary Judgment with supporting legal research content from LexisNexis<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>And oh yes, motions! Because this brave new world includes \u2014 <em>wait for it<\/em> \u2014 AI-generated \u201cMotion to Dismiss\u201d and \u201cMotion for Summary Judgment\u201d workflows. So the two most overused filings in the history of American jurisprudence are now getting the robo-treatment.<\/p>\n<p>I remain worried about of the automated workflow as a concept. Crunching a file into a usable statement of facts can save time and generative AI can also perform the top-level reasoning to draft research queries based on the case materials. But while AI can be a force multiplier along every step of the way, putting together a brief seems like more than the sum of its parts. Legal research is a morass of linguistic subtlety, precedent, and jurisdictional nuance. Even with Shepard\u2019s duct-taped to its forehead, an LLM is one semantic landmine away from confidently pulling the good case while overlooking the great one.<\/p>\n<p>As an unrelated-but-maybe-related aside, in <a href=\"https:\/\/www.lawnext.com\/2025\/06\/legal-ai-platform-harvey-to-get-lexisnexis-content-and-tech-in-new-partnership-between-the-companies.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener nofollow\">Bob Ambrogi\u2019s LawSites coverage<\/a> of this announcement, Harvey CEO Winston Weinberg said, \u201cLawyers have trusted LexisNexis for centuries, so this alliance allows us to provide our customers with data sources they know and rely upon while collaborating with on AI systems that make daily life for our joint customers significantly easier.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>LexisNexis was founded in 1970. <\/p>\n<p>When he says \u201cfor centuries,\u201d does he mean the 20th and the 21st? Because, one, I\u2019m not cool with that. And two, it feels like the sort of \u201ctechnically true but wrong because it misses the nuance\u201d response that worries me about the whole generative AI workflow experience.<\/p>\n<p>The more providers try to put the entire lawyering process on greased rails, the less I trust <em>the humans<\/em> to perform the necessary work to make sure the work product is the best it can be. It\u2019s one thing to \u201cdo legal research\u201d and evaluate the output and another to \u201cdo all the steps at once\u201d and evaluate that output. <\/p>\n<p>It\u2019s hard to describe, but I approached research differently in the advocate role than in the arbitrator\/mediator role. When I would receive briefs from the parties and check up on them, my research was always already contextualized by their finished work product. I had to affirmatively divorce myself from that context to guarantee I got to the right answer. Obviously this product is still in development and might take pains to prevent people from doing this, but the hype around these sorts of workflow agents creeps toward \u201cit will do all the steps to give you something finished that you can just check up on,\u201d but when the output arrives <em>looking finished<\/em>, there\u2019s a bit of a psychological barrier to ripping it back down to the studs to make sure it\u2019s right.<\/p>\n<p>Good lawyers will change how they approach the job to make sure the allure of an automated workflow doesn\u2019t dull their professional judgment. I\u2019m just not sure I trust lawyers enough. <\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>The post <a href=\"https:\/\/abovethelaw.com\/2025\/06\/lexisnexis-harvey-announce-partnership\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">LexisNexis &amp; Harvey Announce Partnership<\/a> appeared first on <a href=\"https:\/\/abovethelaw.com\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Above the Law<\/a>.<\/p>\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image alignright size-large is-resized\"><img data-recalc-dims=\"1\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\" width=\"620\" height=\"413\" src=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/abovethelaw.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/4\/2024\/03\/technology-785742_1280-1-620x413.jpg?resize=620%2C413&#038;ssl=1\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-86459\" title=\"\"><figcaption><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p><em>What did you do during the data wars, kid?<\/em><\/p>\n<p>That\u2019s more or less how someone in the far-flung future will talk about legal technology in 2025. Or we\u2019ll all be driven extinct by SkyNet. One or the other. <\/p>\n<p>As generative AI continues its march into the legal workflow, the flurry of press releases increasingly focus on data access. At the risk of oversimplifying the market, <a href=\"https:\/\/abovethelaw.com\/2024\/07\/generative-ai-what-if-this-is-as-good-as-it-gets\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener nofollow\">advancements in the underlying algorithms are going to stagnate<\/a> and providers have already announced their investment in building better guardrails so the next logical leap for the technology is pairing it with better data. And so that\u2019s the current scramble.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.harvey.ai\/?utm_source=google&amp;utm_medium=cpc&amp;utm_campaign=brand&amp;utm_term=harvey%20ai&amp;gad_source=1&amp;gad_campaignid=21880900257&amp;gbraid=0AAAAA-XoO5300YE0yH-XJtw9HARY0hdOV&amp;gclid=CjwKCAjwx8nCBhAwEiwA_z__06VOM_sSuDVoKlhv5xG5iVPd0s1IlLGptYUEryzDrddY607mkMKQHhoCYHIQAvD_BwE\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener nofollow\">Harvey<\/a> is an AI platform designed for legal professionals, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.lexisnexis.com\/en-us\/gateway.page\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener nofollow\">LexisNexis<\/a> is a vast repository of data and years of categorization and curation\u2026 <a href=\"https:\/\/theyfightcrime.org\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener nofollow\">they fight crime!<\/a><\/p>\n<p>In all seriousness, a while back, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.lawnext.com\/2024\/05\/harvey-ai-to-move-out-of-early-access-phase-release-more-affordable-versions-of-its-custom-ai-models.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener nofollow\">Harvey wanted to build a legal research solution<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/abovethelaw.com\/2025\/01\/lexisnexis-ushers-in-new-era-for-legal-ai\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener nofollow\">LexisNexis worked on an AI solution<\/a>. Now they\u2019re joining forces.<\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow\">\n<p>Within Harvey, customers can ask LexisNexis Prot\u00e9g\u00e9\u2122 to receive comprehensive, trusted AI answers grounded in the LexisNexis collection of U.S. case law and statutes, validated through Shepard\u2019s<sup>\u00ae<\/sup> Citations. Harvey users can ask complex legal questions in natural language and receive citation-supported answers from primary sources of law, refine their queries through follow-up questions, and seamlessly continue their research. Answers are generated using LexisNexis fine-tuned models within a proprietary infrastructure that anchors responses in legal content, metadata, and case law relationships, powered by Shepard\u2019s<sup>\u00ae<\/sup> Knowledge Graph and Point of Law Graph technology.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>Now Harvey users have the data and LexisNexis can deliver its product through a platform delivering AI to lawyers across use cases.<\/p>\n<p>Why isn\u2019t this just an acquisition like when Thomson Reuters bought Casetext? Unclear. The many tentacled LexisNexis corporate octopus has money in Harvey so it wouldn\u2019t be crazy to bring it all under one roof. And despite the alliance talk, it seems as though this will eventually create redundancies. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.artificiallawyer.com\/2025\/06\/18\/lexisnexis-harvey-announce-alliance-will-share-legal-data\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener nofollow\">Artificial Lawyer asked that question outright<\/a> and was told by LexisNexis North America, UK, and Ireland CEO Sean Fitzpatrick, \u201cWho knows where this will go?\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Pretty sure the answer is some kind of merger. <\/p>\n<p>The deal also includes a tease for some workflows getting the robo-treatment:<\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow\">\n<p>Harvey and LexisNexis will also develop sophisticated legal workflows built on the latest generative AI technology. These co-developed workflows will initially include:<\/p>\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Motion to Dismiss Workflow:<\/strong> Generates high-quality Motion to Dismiss arguments and related client communications with legal research content from LexisNexis<\/li>\n<li><strong>Motion for Summary Judgment Workflow:<\/strong> Automates key steps in drafting a Motion for Summary Judgment with supporting legal research content from LexisNexis<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>And oh yes, motions! Because this brave new world includes \u2014 <em>wait for it<\/em> \u2014 AI-generated \u201cMotion to Dismiss\u201d and \u201cMotion for Summary Judgment\u201d workflows. So the two most overused filings in the history of American jurisprudence are now getting the robo-treatment.<\/p>\n<p>I remain worried about of the automated workflow as a concept. Crunching a file into a usable statement of facts can save time and generative AI can also perform the top-level reasoning to draft research queries based on the case materials. But while AI can be a force multiplier along every step of the way, putting together a brief seems like more than the sum of its parts. Legal research is a morass of linguistic subtlety, precedent, and jurisdictional nuance. Even with Shepard\u2019s duct-taped to its forehead, an LLM is one semantic landmine away from confidently pulling the good case while overlooking the great one.<\/p>\n<p>As an unrelated-but-maybe-related aside, in <a href=\"https:\/\/www.lawnext.com\/2025\/06\/legal-ai-platform-harvey-to-get-lexisnexis-content-and-tech-in-new-partnership-between-the-companies.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener nofollow\">Bob Ambrogi\u2019s LawSites coverage<\/a> of this announcement, Harvey CEO Winston Weinberg said, \u201cLawyers have trusted LexisNexis for centuries, so this alliance allows us to provide our customers with data sources they know and rely upon while collaborating with on AI systems that make daily life for our joint customers significantly easier.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>LexisNexis was founded in 1970. <\/p>\n<p>When he says \u201cfor centuries,\u201d does he mean the 20th and the 21st? Because, one, I\u2019m not cool with that. And two, it feels like the sort of \u201ctechnically true but wrong because it misses the nuance\u201d response that worries me about the whole generative AI workflow experience.<\/p>\n<p>The more providers try to put the entire lawyering process on greased rails, the less I trust <em>the humans<\/em> to perform the necessary work to make sure the work product is the best it can be. It\u2019s one thing to \u201cdo legal research\u201d and evaluate the output and another to \u201cdo all the steps at once\u201d and evaluate that output. <\/p>\n<p>It\u2019s hard to describe, but I approached research differently in the advocate role than in the arbitrator\/mediator role. When I would receive briefs from the parties and check up on them, my research was always already contextualized by their finished work product. I had to affirmatively divorce myself from that context to guarantee I got to the right answer. Obviously this product is still in development and might take pains to prevent people from doing this, but the hype around these sorts of workflow agents creeps toward \u201cit will do all the steps to give you something finished that you can just check up on,\u201d but when the output arrives <em>looking finished<\/em>, there\u2019s a bit of a psychological barrier to ripping it back down to the studs to make sure it\u2019s right.<\/p>\n<p>Good lawyers will change how they approach the job to make sure the allure of an automated workflow doesn\u2019t dull their professional judgment. I\u2019m just not sure I trust lawyers enough. <\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>The post <a href=\"https:\/\/abovethelaw.com\/2025\/06\/lexisnexis-harvey-announce-partnership\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">LexisNexis &amp; Harvey Announce Partnership<\/a> appeared first on <a href=\"https:\/\/abovethelaw.com\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Above the Law<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>What did you do during the data wars, kid? That\u2019s more or less how someone in the far-flung future will talk about legal technology in 2025. Or we\u2019ll all be driven extinct by SkyNet. One or the other. As generative AI continues its march into the legal workflow, the flurry of press releases increasingly focus [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":123274,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[16],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-123291","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-above_the_law"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/xira.com\/p\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/technology-785742_1280-1-620x413-TDaRiz.jpeg?fit=620%2C413&ssl=1","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/xira.com\/p\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/123291","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/xira.com\/p\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/xira.com\/p\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/xira.com\/p\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/xira.com\/p\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=123291"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/xira.com\/p\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/123291\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/xira.com\/p\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/123274"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/xira.com\/p\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=123291"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/xira.com\/p\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=123291"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/xira.com\/p\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=123291"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}