{"id":125086,"date":"2025-07-01T16:02:54","date_gmt":"2025-07-02T00:02:54","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/xira.com\/p\/2025\/07\/01\/trumps-lawyers-go-to-iowa-to-learn-how-to-civpro\/"},"modified":"2025-07-01T16:02:54","modified_gmt":"2025-07-02T00:02:54","slug":"trumps-lawyers-go-to-iowa-to-learn-how-to-civpro","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/xira.com\/p\/2025\/07\/01\/trumps-lawyers-go-to-iowa-to-learn-how-to-civpro\/","title":{"rendered":"Trump\u2019s Lawyers Go To Iowa To Learn How To CivPro"},"content":{"rendered":"<figure class=\"wp-block-image alignright size-full is-resized\"><img data-recalc-dims=\"1\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\" width=\"594\" height=\"396\" src=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/abovethelaw.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/4\/2023\/11\/GettyImages-1778382010.jpg?resize=594%2C396&#038;ssl=1\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-85494\" title=\"\"><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\">(Photo by Brendan McDermid-Pool\/Getty Images)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>Donald Trump\u2019s lawyer Edward \u201cSideshow Bob\u201d Paltzik is gonna learn him some civil procedure if he has to step on every rake in Iowa. And he might!<\/p>\n<p>His adventures began in December of 2024, when he and local counsel Alan Ostergren filed a <a href=\"https:\/\/abovethelaw.com\/2024\/12\/donald-trump-sues-yet-another-media-outlet-for-tortious-journalism-ing\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">trollsuit<\/a> in Polk County District Court against pollster Ann Selzer and the <em>Des Moines Register<\/em> for aggravated <a href=\"https:\/\/www.desmoinesregister.com\/story\/news\/politics\/iowa-poll\/2024\/11\/02\/iowa-poll-kamala-harris-leads-donald-trump-2024-presidential-race\/75354033007\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">getting a poll wrong<\/a>. The case was premised on the theory that the \u201cpoll\u201d was actually a <a href=\"https:\/\/www.lawandchaospod.com\/p\/trump-discovers-one-weird-trick-to\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">super-secret conspiracy<\/a> by Selzer, the <em>Des Moines Register<\/em>, and the Register\u2019s parent company Gannett to defraud Iowa \u201cconsumers\u201d by supplying defective \u201cmerchandise\u201d in violation of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.legis.iowa.gov\/docs\/code\/714H.pdf\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Iowa\u2019s Consumer Fraud Act<\/a>.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>But perhaps the president\u2019s sparklemagic counsel should have spent less time on their whizbang theory and more time hiring a process server. In the event, they only managed to serve Gannett, a Delaware company doing business in New York, which instantly filed a <a href=\"https:\/\/abovethelaw.com\/2024\/12\/gannett-removes-trump-trollsuit-against-iowa-poll-to-federal-court\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">notice of removal<\/a>, bouncing the case into the US District Court for the Southern District of Iowa. And that\u2019s how young Eddie learned about <a href=\"https:\/\/podcasts.apple.com\/us\/podcast\/ep-136-trump-announces-plan-to-break-law-gets-immediately\/id1727769913?i=1000710085513\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">snap removal<\/a>!<\/p>\n<p>But Trump\u2019s legal team had another trick up its sleeve! On January 31, they <a href=\"https:\/\/storage.courtlistener.com\/recap\/gov.uscourts.iasd.89411\/gov.uscourts.iasd.89411.23.0.pdf\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">amended the complaint<\/a> adding two Iowa lawmakers, US Rep Mariannette Miller-Meeks and former state senator Bradley Zaun, as plaintiffs. The move was a transparent attempt to get the case remanded to state court by defeating diversity jurisdiction. In fact, Selzer hadn\u2019t even polled Zaun\u2019s race. Which is how Paltzik learned about fraudulent joinder, as well as judicial discretion. Exercising the second, Judge Rebecca Ebinger declined to find the first, but nonetheless <a href=\"https:\/\/storage.courtlistener.com\/recap\/gov.uscourts.iasd.89411\/gov.uscourts.iasd.89411.65.0_1.pdf\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">ruled<\/a> that the lawmakers were not \u201cindispensable\u201d parties and denied the motion for joinder. On May 23, she ordered Trump to file an amended complaint without the rando politicians in seven days.<\/p>\n<p>Judge Ebinger did give the plaintiff a gift of sorts, though. Noting that snap removal hadn\u2019t been definitively blessed by the Eighth Circuit, she certified the issue for interlocutory appeal. Trump immediately <a href=\"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/docket\/70455854\/donald-j-trump-v-j-selzer\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">accepted the invitation<\/a> and secured a brief stay until July 18 to file his amended complaint.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>But time waits for no clown, and in the meantime the Iowa state legislature <a href=\"https:\/\/www.legis.iowa.gov\/legislation\/BillBook?ga=91&amp;ba=HF472\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">unanimously passed a bill<\/a> to create an expedited motion for media defendants to dismiss SLAPP suits that target the freedom of the press. That bill, House File 472, was signed into law by Gov. Kim Reynolds on May 19 and takes effect on July 1.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Had Trump filed his amended complaint on June 1, as instructed, he\u2019d have been in the clear. But amending his complaint on July 18 would likely have subjected his garbage suit to the fee-shifting provision of the new anti-SLAPP law in the unlikely scenario that he was able to persuade the Eighth Circuit to remand him to state court.<\/p>\n<p>And so, with that anti-SLAPP clock ticking, Trump\u2019s lawyers put on their MAGA hats and hatched a clever plan to get back into state court one day before the new law was scheduled to go into effect. On Monday, they filed a <a href=\"https:\/\/storage.courtlistener.com\/recap\/gov.uscourts.iasd.89411\/gov.uscourts.iasd.89411.71.0.pdf\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">notice of voluntary dismissal<\/a> in federal court and simultaneously <a href=\"https:\/\/storage.courtlistener.com\/recap\/gov.uscourts.iasd.89411\/gov.uscourts.iasd.89411.72.3.pdf\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">re-filed in state court<\/a>. If they could just remember to serve the Iowa defendants first, they\u2019d be home free!<\/p>\n<p>Except \u2026 THEY FORGOT ABOUT THEIR APPEAL TO THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT.<\/p>\n<p>Trump\u2019s pending appeal divested the trial court of jurisdiction to dismiss his case. He needed to dismiss that appeal <em>before<\/em> voluntarily dismissing the complaint in the district court. Which he could have done, even without the defendants\u2019 consent, so long as he did it <em>first<\/em> (and gave the court sufficient time to enter an order of dismissal).<\/p>\n<p>And that\u2019s how counselor Paltzik learned about <a href=\"https:\/\/www.law.cornell.edu\/rules\/frap\/rule_42\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Rule 42<\/a> of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure!<\/p>\n<p>Hours after Trump tried to nope out of his lawsuit, Gannett <a href=\"https:\/\/storage.courtlistener.com\/recap\/gov.uscourts.iasd.89411\/gov.uscourts.iasd.89411.72.0.pdf\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">moved to strike<\/a> the notice of dismissal as improper. Today, Judge Ebinger <a href=\"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/docket\/69476247\/trump-v-selzer\/?order_by=desc#entry-73\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">ordered<\/a> Trump\u2019s lawyers to respond to that motion to strike within 24 hours. Can\u2019t wait to see what vagaries of civil procedure these geniuses learn next!<\/p>\n<p>It\u2019s difficult to imagine what they\u2019ll say, but given that this is the team that thinks being wrong about math is a tort, they\u2019ll undoubtedly come up with <em>something<\/em>. But for all intents and purposes, even if they win, the federal court will enter an order of dismissal dated July 2 or later. And that means the deadline for Trump to sneak into state court ahead of the new anti-SLAPP law has almost certainly come and gone.<\/p>\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\">\n<p><em><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/bsky.app\/profile\/lizdye.bsky.social\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener nofollow\">Liz Dye<\/a> and\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/bsky.app\/profile\/andrewtorrez.bsky.social\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener nofollow\">Andrew Torrez<\/a>\u00a0produce the Law and Chaos\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.lawandchaospod.com\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener nofollow\">Substack<\/a> and\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/podcasts.apple.com\/us\/podcast\/law-and-chaos\/id1727769913\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener nofollow\">podcast<\/a>.<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n<p>The post <a href=\"https:\/\/abovethelaw.com\/2025\/07\/trumps-lawyers-go-to-iowa-to-learn-how-to-civpro\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Trump\u2019s Lawyers Go To Iowa To Learn How To CivPro<\/a> appeared first on <a href=\"https:\/\/abovethelaw.com\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Above the Law<\/a>.<\/p>\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image alignright size-full is-resized\"><img data-recalc-dims=\"1\" loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"594\" height=\"396\" src=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/abovethelaw.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/4\/2023\/11\/GettyImages-1778382010.jpg?resize=594%2C396&#038;ssl=1\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-85494\" title=\"\"><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\">(Photo by Brendan McDermid-Pool\/Getty Images)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>Donald Trump\u2019s lawyer Edward \u201cSideshow Bob\u201d Paltzik is gonna learn him some civil procedure if he has to step on every rake in Iowa. And he might!<\/p>\n<p>His adventures began in December of 2024, when he and local counsel Alan Ostergren filed a <a href=\"https:\/\/abovethelaw.com\/2024\/12\/donald-trump-sues-yet-another-media-outlet-for-tortious-journalism-ing\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">trollsuit<\/a> in Polk County District Court against pollster Ann Selzer and the <em>Des Moines Register<\/em> for aggravated <a href=\"https:\/\/www.desmoinesregister.com\/story\/news\/politics\/iowa-poll\/2024\/11\/02\/iowa-poll-kamala-harris-leads-donald-trump-2024-presidential-race\/75354033007\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">getting a poll wrong<\/a>. The case was premised on the theory that the \u201cpoll\u201d was actually a <a href=\"https:\/\/www.lawandchaospod.com\/p\/trump-discovers-one-weird-trick-to\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">super-secret conspiracy<\/a> by Selzer, the <em>Des Moines Register<\/em>, and the Register\u2019s parent company Gannett to defraud Iowa \u201cconsumers\u201d by supplying defective \u201cmerchandise\u201d in violation of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.legis.iowa.gov\/docs\/code\/714H.pdf\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Iowa\u2019s Consumer Fraud Act<\/a>.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>But perhaps the president\u2019s sparklemagic counsel should have spent less time on their whizbang theory and more time hiring a process server. In the event, they only managed to serve Gannett, a Delaware company doing business in New York, which instantly filed a <a href=\"https:\/\/abovethelaw.com\/2024\/12\/gannett-removes-trump-trollsuit-against-iowa-poll-to-federal-court\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">notice of removal<\/a>, bouncing the case into the US District Court for the Southern District of Iowa. And that\u2019s how young Eddie learned about <a href=\"https:\/\/podcasts.apple.com\/us\/podcast\/ep-136-trump-announces-plan-to-break-law-gets-immediately\/id1727769913?i=1000710085513\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">snap removal<\/a>!<\/p>\n<p>But Trump\u2019s legal team had another trick up its sleeve! On January 31, they <a href=\"https:\/\/storage.courtlistener.com\/recap\/gov.uscourts.iasd.89411\/gov.uscourts.iasd.89411.23.0.pdf\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">amended the complaint<\/a> adding two Iowa lawmakers, US Rep Mariannette Miller-Meeks and former state senator Bradley Zaun, as plaintiffs. The move was a transparent attempt to get the case remanded to state court by defeating diversity jurisdiction. In fact, Selzer hadn\u2019t even polled Zaun\u2019s race. Which is how Paltzik learned about fraudulent joinder, as well as judicial discretion. Exercising the second, Judge Rebecca Ebinger declined to find the first, but nonetheless <a href=\"https:\/\/storage.courtlistener.com\/recap\/gov.uscourts.iasd.89411\/gov.uscourts.iasd.89411.65.0_1.pdf\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">ruled<\/a> that the lawmakers were not \u201cindispensable\u201d parties and denied the motion for joinder. On May 23, she ordered Trump to file an amended complaint without the rando politicians in seven days.<\/p>\n<p>Judge Ebinger did give the plaintiff a gift of sorts, though. Noting that snap removal hadn\u2019t been definitively blessed by the Eighth Circuit, she certified the issue for interlocutory appeal. Trump immediately <a href=\"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/docket\/70455854\/donald-j-trump-v-j-selzer\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">accepted the invitation<\/a> and secured a brief stay until July 18 to file his amended complaint.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>But time waits for no clown, and in the meantime the Iowa state legislature <a href=\"https:\/\/www.legis.iowa.gov\/legislation\/BillBook?ga=91&amp;ba=HF472\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">unanimously passed a bill<\/a> to create an expedited motion for media defendants to dismiss SLAPP suits that target the freedom of the press. That bill, House File 472, was signed into law by Gov. Kim Reynolds on May 19 and takes effect on July 1.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Had Trump filed his amended complaint on June 1, as instructed, he\u2019d have been in the clear. But amending his complaint on July 18 would likely have subjected his garbage suit to the fee-shifting provision of the new anti-SLAPP law in the unlikely scenario that he was able to persuade the Eighth Circuit to remand him to state court.<\/p>\n<p>And so, with that anti-SLAPP clock ticking, Trump\u2019s lawyers put on their MAGA hats and hatched a clever plan to get back into state court one day before the new law was scheduled to go into effect. On Monday, they filed a <a href=\"https:\/\/storage.courtlistener.com\/recap\/gov.uscourts.iasd.89411\/gov.uscourts.iasd.89411.71.0.pdf\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">notice of voluntary dismissal<\/a> in federal court and simultaneously <a href=\"https:\/\/storage.courtlistener.com\/recap\/gov.uscourts.iasd.89411\/gov.uscourts.iasd.89411.72.3.pdf\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">re-filed in state court<\/a>. If they could just remember to serve the Iowa defendants first, they\u2019d be home free!<\/p>\n<p>Except \u2026 THEY FORGOT ABOUT THEIR APPEAL TO THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT.<\/p>\n<p>Trump\u2019s pending appeal divested the trial court of jurisdiction to dismiss his case. He needed to dismiss that appeal <em>before<\/em> voluntarily dismissing the complaint in the district court. Which he could have done, even without the defendants\u2019 consent, so long as he did it <em>first<\/em> (and gave the court sufficient time to enter an order of dismissal).<\/p>\n<p>And that\u2019s how counselor Paltzik learned about <a href=\"https:\/\/www.law.cornell.edu\/rules\/frap\/rule_42\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Rule 42<\/a> of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure!<\/p>\n<p>Hours after Trump tried to nope out of his lawsuit, Gannett <a href=\"https:\/\/storage.courtlistener.com\/recap\/gov.uscourts.iasd.89411\/gov.uscourts.iasd.89411.72.0.pdf\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">moved to strike<\/a> the notice of dismissal as improper. Today, Judge Ebinger <a href=\"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/docket\/69476247\/trump-v-selzer\/?order_by=desc#entry-73\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">ordered<\/a> Trump\u2019s lawyers to respond to that motion to strike within 24 hours. Can\u2019t wait to see what vagaries of civil procedure these geniuses learn next!<\/p>\n<p>It\u2019s difficult to imagine what they\u2019ll say, but given that this is the team that thinks being wrong about math is a tort, they\u2019ll undoubtedly come up with <em>something<\/em>. But for all intents and purposes, even if they win, the federal court will enter an order of dismissal dated July 2 or later. And that means the deadline for Trump to sneak into state court ahead of the new anti-SLAPP law has almost certainly come and gone.<\/p>\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\" \/>\n<p><em><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/bsky.app\/profile\/lizdye.bsky.social\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener nofollow\">Liz Dye<\/a> and\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/bsky.app\/profile\/andrewtorrez.bsky.social\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener nofollow\">Andrew Torrez<\/a>\u00a0produce the Law and Chaos\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.lawandchaospod.com\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener nofollow\">Substack<\/a> and\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/podcasts.apple.com\/us\/podcast\/law-and-chaos\/id1727769913\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener nofollow\">podcast<\/a>.<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>(Photo by Brendan McDermid-Pool\/Getty Images) Donald Trump\u2019s lawyer Edward \u201cSideshow Bob\u201d Paltzik is gonna learn him some civil procedure if he has to step on every rake in Iowa. And he might! His adventures began in December of 2024, when he and local counsel Alan Ostergren filed a trollsuit in Polk County District Court against [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":125087,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[16],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-125086","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-above_the_law"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/xira.com\/p\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/GettyImages-1778382010-kcBoK6.jpeg?fit=594%2C396&ssl=1","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/xira.com\/p\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/125086","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/xira.com\/p\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/xira.com\/p\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/xira.com\/p\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/xira.com\/p\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=125086"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/xira.com\/p\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/125086\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/xira.com\/p\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/125087"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/xira.com\/p\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=125086"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/xira.com\/p\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=125086"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/xira.com\/p\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=125086"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}