![\"\"](\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.attorneyatwork.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Vibe-lawyering-with-Generative-AI.jpg?resize=770%2C495&ssl=1\" "\\"\\"")
Table of contents<\/h2>\n\n- Three Tips for Vibe Lawyering<\/a><\/li>\n
- Tip No. 1: No Blank Slates for Formal Agreements<\/a><\/li>\n
- Tip No. 2: Make Sure to Ground It<\/a><\/li>\n
- Tip No. 3: Streamline your Summaries<\/a><\/li>\n
- The Verdict on Vibe Lawyering<\/a><\/li>\n
- More Tips on Using AI Effectively and Ethically<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n
Three Tips for Vibe Lawyering<\/h2>\n
With vibe coding, programmers can shift from pure manual code-writing to a project management role, guiding Gen AI and refining the results. Lawyers should feel free to harness the power of Gen AI \u2014 judiciously and ethically \u2014 and vibe away. <\/p>\n
That said, here are three tips to keep in mind.<\/p>\n
Tip No. 1: No Blank Slates for Formal Agreements<\/h2>\n
One trick to successful vibe lawyering is figuring out which use cases it\u2019s suited for and which use cases it isn\u2019t.\u00a0<\/p>\n
One obvious application of Gen AI for lawyers is to help with drafting, but not every drafting scenario is a good fit. For instance, you shouldn\u2019t be asking AI to create an NDA, a commercial lease, or some other formal agreement from scratch. <\/p>\n
Clients expect consistency, reliability and repeatability from legal service providers. If lawyers strategically repurpose their templates<\/a> and other know-how, then 90% of the clauses and language in an agreement they put together will be identical every time. (There might be a couple of bits that change depending on negotiation, but for the most part, the output will be very consistent.)\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\nThat consistency \u2014 and the best practices baked into the language that creates that consistency \u2014 goes out the window if you give AI a blank slate and say, \u201cHey AI, create a share purchase agreement for me.\u201d\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
Tip No. 2: Make Sure to Ground It<\/h2>\n
The way to tiptoe around this potential pitfall is by grounding the material AI is able to draw upon when creating documents. Lawyers with a single centralized repository for documents have an advantage, as that makes it easier to identify the trusted data sets that AI can leverage.\u00a0<\/p>\n
However, it is still necessary to differentiate between useful and irrelevant information within the repository. For example, you want to point the AI towards the final approved documents rather than multiple iterative drafts. Human involvement is crucial for this curation process (AI can\u2019t do it on its own), and lawyers should perform this task regularly to ensure the best available data is consistently provided to the AI.\u00a0<\/p>\n
Note that the security attached to your document repository will limit AI\u2019s access to certain files within the system. This means Gen AI can provide different responses based on different user access permissions. In a solo legal practice, this isn\u2019t a problem, but even within a two- or three-person practice (let alone a 50\u2013 to 100-person practice), this situation can lead to inconsistencies where different lawyers receive varied results for the same query, depending on what level of access they have.\u00a0<\/p>\n
To address this, lawyers should identify which documents can be widely shared. For example, initial discussions about handling deals or strategies are typically confidential, while final documents related to public deals may be more accessible. Additionally, to achieve consistent responses and optimal outcomes, you might consider adopting a more open security approach for knowledge assets and best practices content. <\/p>\n
Tip No. 3: Streamline your Summaries<\/h2>\n
While drafting formal agreements might not lend itself to a casual \u201cvibe lawyering\u201d approach unless the necessary guardrails are in place, there are some drafting scenarios where \u201cvibe lawyering\u201d might actually find fertile ground: Think here of summary notes.\u00a0<\/p>\n
Rare is the lawyer who hasn\u2019t had to distill complex information into digestible insights for their clients. For instance, in response to regulatory changes, a specialist might review new legislation, extract the material changes, and produce a concise summary note for the client\u2019s benefit. In the litigation realm, a lawyer might craft a summary note from lengthy judgments or case files, highlighting key facts, participants and judicial decisions.\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
Using AI to streamline the creation of summary notes can provide a massive efficiency gain by quickly reading and summarizing material. This provides a solid starting point that the lawyer can then refine as needed. In the \u201cvibe coding\u201d world, this is the equivalent of quickly establishing a \u201cminimum viable product\u201d or software prototype that the developer can then tweak and adjust.\u00a0<\/p>\n
The Verdict on Vibe Lawyering<\/h2>\n
So, should lawyers give in to the vibes? <\/p>\n
The bottom line: For drafting scenarios where the output is something like a summary note rather than a legally binding document, lawyers should feel free to vibe away.\u00a0This distinction makes clear that AI needs to be applied wisely and judiciously for the best results. By identifying the right use cases and grounding AI applications in high-quality, curated data where needed, legal professionals can safely and effectively use Gen AI without creating problems for themselves or their clients.\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
Understanding both how and when vibe lawyering is a viable approach is the key. And while it shouldn\u2019t need saying, rigor is the final step: Proof like your reputation depends on it, because it does.\u00a0<\/p>\n
\nMore Tips on Using AI Effectively and Ethically<\/h2>\n\n- Generative AI for Lawyers: From Fear to Functionality, How Lawyers Can Ethically Integrate AI into Their Practice<\/a><\/li>\n
- Advancing Litigation Support: 3 Ways to Fuel Innovation Within Your Litigation Team<\/a><\/li>\n
- AI in Law Firms: The AI Revolution in the Business of Law<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
Image \u00a9 iStockPhoto.com. <\/p>\n
\n![\"\"](\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.attorneyatwork.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/AttorneyatWork-Logo-%C2%AE-2021-1.jpg?resize=372%2C106&ssl=1\" "\\"\\"")
<\/a><\/figure>\n\nSign up for Attorney at Work\u2019s daily practice tips newsletter here<\/a> and subscribe to our podcast<\/a>, Attorney at Work Today.<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Should lawyers take a page out of the coders\u2019 book and start embracing \u201cvibe lawyering\u201d?\u00a0 iManage’s Paul Walker has three great tips. The post Should You Be \u2018Vibe Lawyering\u2019 with Generative AI? appeared first on Articles, Tips and Tech for Law Firms and Lawyers. In software development circles, the arrival of generative AI has given […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[17],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-128345","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-legal_matters"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/xira.com\/p\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/128345","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/xira.com\/p\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/xira.com\/p\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/xira.com\/p\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/xira.com\/p\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=128345"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/xira.com\/p\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/128345\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/xira.com\/p\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=128345"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/xira.com\/p\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=128345"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/xira.com\/p\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=128345"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
Three Tips for Vibe Lawyering<\/h2>\n
With vibe coding, programmers can shift from pure manual code-writing to a project management role, guiding Gen AI and refining the results. Lawyers should feel free to harness the power of Gen AI \u2014 judiciously and ethically \u2014 and vibe away. <\/p>\n
That said, here are three tips to keep in mind.<\/p>\n
Tip No. 1: No Blank Slates for Formal Agreements<\/h2>\n
One trick to successful vibe lawyering is figuring out which use cases it\u2019s suited for and which use cases it isn\u2019t.\u00a0<\/p>\n
One obvious application of Gen AI for lawyers is to help with drafting, but not every drafting scenario is a good fit. For instance, you shouldn\u2019t be asking AI to create an NDA, a commercial lease, or some other formal agreement from scratch. <\/p>\n
Clients expect consistency, reliability and repeatability from legal service providers. If lawyers strategically repurpose their templates<\/a> and other know-how, then 90% of the clauses and language in an agreement they put together will be identical every time. (There might be a couple of bits that change depending on negotiation, but for the most part, the output will be very consistent.)\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n That consistency \u2014 and the best practices baked into the language that creates that consistency \u2014 goes out the window if you give AI a blank slate and say, \u201cHey AI, create a share purchase agreement for me.\u201d\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n The way to tiptoe around this potential pitfall is by grounding the material AI is able to draw upon when creating documents. Lawyers with a single centralized repository for documents have an advantage, as that makes it easier to identify the trusted data sets that AI can leverage.\u00a0<\/p>\n However, it is still necessary to differentiate between useful and irrelevant information within the repository. For example, you want to point the AI towards the final approved documents rather than multiple iterative drafts. Human involvement is crucial for this curation process (AI can\u2019t do it on its own), and lawyers should perform this task regularly to ensure the best available data is consistently provided to the AI.\u00a0<\/p>\n Note that the security attached to your document repository will limit AI\u2019s access to certain files within the system. This means Gen AI can provide different responses based on different user access permissions. In a solo legal practice, this isn\u2019t a problem, but even within a two- or three-person practice (let alone a 50\u2013 to 100-person practice), this situation can lead to inconsistencies where different lawyers receive varied results for the same query, depending on what level of access they have.\u00a0<\/p>\n To address this, lawyers should identify which documents can be widely shared. For example, initial discussions about handling deals or strategies are typically confidential, while final documents related to public deals may be more accessible. Additionally, to achieve consistent responses and optimal outcomes, you might consider adopting a more open security approach for knowledge assets and best practices content. <\/p>\n While drafting formal agreements might not lend itself to a casual \u201cvibe lawyering\u201d approach unless the necessary guardrails are in place, there are some drafting scenarios where \u201cvibe lawyering\u201d might actually find fertile ground: Think here of summary notes.\u00a0<\/p>\n Rare is the lawyer who hasn\u2019t had to distill complex information into digestible insights for their clients. For instance, in response to regulatory changes, a specialist might review new legislation, extract the material changes, and produce a concise summary note for the client\u2019s benefit. In the litigation realm, a lawyer might craft a summary note from lengthy judgments or case files, highlighting key facts, participants and judicial decisions.\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n Using AI to streamline the creation of summary notes can provide a massive efficiency gain by quickly reading and summarizing material. This provides a solid starting point that the lawyer can then refine as needed. In the \u201cvibe coding\u201d world, this is the equivalent of quickly establishing a \u201cminimum viable product\u201d or software prototype that the developer can then tweak and adjust.\u00a0<\/p>\n So, should lawyers give in to the vibes? <\/p>\n The bottom line: For drafting scenarios where the output is something like a summary note rather than a legally binding document, lawyers should feel free to vibe away.\u00a0This distinction makes clear that AI needs to be applied wisely and judiciously for the best results. By identifying the right use cases and grounding AI applications in high-quality, curated data where needed, legal professionals can safely and effectively use Gen AI without creating problems for themselves or their clients.\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n Understanding both how and when vibe lawyering is a viable approach is the key. And while it shouldn\u2019t need saying, rigor is the final step: Proof like your reputation depends on it, because it does.\u00a0<\/p>\n Image \u00a9 iStockPhoto.com. <\/p>\n Sign up for Attorney at Work\u2019s daily practice tips newsletter here<\/a> and subscribe to our podcast<\/a>, Attorney at Work Today.<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Should lawyers take a page out of the coders\u2019 book and start embracing \u201cvibe lawyering\u201d?\u00a0 iManage’s Paul Walker has three great tips. The post Should You Be \u2018Vibe Lawyering\u2019 with Generative AI? appeared first on Articles, Tips and Tech for Law Firms and Lawyers. In software development circles, the arrival of generative AI has given […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[17],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-128345","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-legal_matters"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/xira.com\/p\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/128345","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/xira.com\/p\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/xira.com\/p\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/xira.com\/p\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/xira.com\/p\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=128345"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/xira.com\/p\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/128345\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/xira.com\/p\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=128345"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/xira.com\/p\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=128345"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/xira.com\/p\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=128345"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}Tip No. 2: Make Sure to Ground It<\/h2>\n
Tip No. 3: Streamline your Summaries<\/h2>\n
The Verdict on Vibe Lawyering<\/h2>\n
\nMore Tips on Using AI Effectively and Ethically<\/h2>\n
\n
<\/a><\/figure>\n