{"id":143710,"date":"2026-02-09T16:04:57","date_gmt":"2026-02-10T00:04:57","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/xira.com\/p\/2026\/02\/09\/federal-judge-reminds-dhs-that-court-orders-are-not-optional\/"},"modified":"2026-02-09T16:04:57","modified_gmt":"2026-02-10T00:04:57","slug":"federal-judge-reminds-dhs-that-court-orders-are-not-optional","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/xira.com\/p\/2026\/02\/09\/federal-judge-reminds-dhs-that-court-orders-are-not-optional\/","title":{"rendered":"Federal Judge Reminds DHS That Court Orders Are Not Optional"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Another day, another federal judge having to explain to the Trump administration that court orders are not optional suggestions.<\/p>\n<p>This time, the lecture came from Judge Matthew Kennelly of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, who found that the Department of Homeland Security failed to comply with a prior order directing it to unfreeze migrant support funds owed to Chicago, Denver, and Pima County, Arizona. Because you don\u2019t get to dodge your legal obligations just because you\u2019d rather not follow them.<\/p>\n<p>The case centers on reimbursement requests submitted by local governments under federal migrant support grants. Those requests were filed before Homeland Security formally terminated the grants, and the law requires agencies to process reimbursements within a statutory 30-day window. Instead of paying up or offering a lawful explanation for denying the requests, the administration froze the funds and then argued that it no longer had to meet the reimbursement deadline because the grants were now in \u201ccloseout.\u201d <\/p>\n<p>Judge Kennelly was not impressed.<\/p>\n<p>The governing regulation, he explained, \u201cdoes not contemplate allowing a federal agency to escape its regulatory obligations simply because it later terminates a grant.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>This ruling fits neatly into a <a href=\"https:\/\/abovethelaw.com\/2026\/01\/bush-appointed-federal-judge-to-ice-comply-with-court-courts-ice-youve-got-us-there\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">growing stack<\/a> of<a href=\"https:\/\/abovethelaw.com\/2026\/01\/dont-hide-the-ball-judge-puts-dojs-lawyers-on-blast\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\"> judicial orders<\/a> documenting the administration\u2019s increasingly casual relationship with the concept of a co-equal branch of government. Time and again, courts have had to spell out what should be basic civics: executive agencies don\u2019t get to ignore deadlines, rewrite regulations on the fly, or treat judicial oversight as a nuisance to be managed rather than authority to be respected.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.bloomberglaw.com\/public\/desktop\/document\/CityOfChicagoetalvDepartmentofHomelandSecurityetalDocketNo125cv05\/9?doc_id=X6OQ10OBKJA9NGO88QOAD62G4OA\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Judge Kennelly\u2019s order<\/a> doesn\u2019t do anything flashy. It doesn\u2019t grandstand. It simply insists that the government do what the law requires. But in the current climate, that insistence itself feels momentous.<\/p>\n<hr>\n<p><strong><em><img data-recalc-dims=\"1\" loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\" wp-image-80083 alignright\" src=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/abovethelaw.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/4\/2021\/06\/IMG_5243-1-scaled-e1623338814705-620x568.jpg?resize=174%2C160&#038;ssl=1\" alt=\"\" width=\"174\" height=\"160\" title=\"\">Kathryn Rubino is a Senior Editor at Above the Law, host of <a href=\"https:\/\/open.spotify.com\/show\/1XC11QhFCWxWr4NQrk2sEA\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">The Jabot podcast<\/a>, and co-host of <a href=\"https:\/\/legaltalknetwork.com\/podcasts\/thinking-like-a-lawyer\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Thinking Like A Lawyer<\/a>. AtL tipsters are the best, so please connect with her. Feel free to email <a href=\"mailto:kathryn@abovethelaw.com?subject=Your%20Column\" target='_blank\"' rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">her<\/a> with any tips, questions, or comments and follow her on Twitter <a href=\"https:\/\/abovethelaw.com\/2026\/02\/federal-judge-reminds-dhs-that-court-orders-are-not-optional\/%E2%80%9C\/\/twitter.com\/Kathryn1%22%E2%80%9D\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">@Kathryn1<\/a>\u00a0or Mastodon <a href=\"https:\/\/abovethelaw.com\/2026\/02\/federal-judge-reminds-dhs-that-court-orders-are-not-optional\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">@Kathryn1@mastodon.social.<\/a><\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>The post <a href=\"https:\/\/abovethelaw.com\/2026\/02\/federal-judge-reminds-dhs-that-court-orders-are-not-optional\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Federal Judge Reminds DHS That Court Orders Are Not Optional<\/a> appeared first on <a href=\"https:\/\/abovethelaw.com\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Above the Law<\/a>.<\/p>\n<figure class=\"post-single__featured-image post-single__featured-image--medium alignright\"><img data-recalc-dims=\"1\" loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" src=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/abovethelaw.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/4\/2016\/05\/scales-of-justice-money-law-legal-business-finance-300x200.jpg?resize=300%2C200&#038;ssl=1\" class=\"attachment-medium size-medium wp-post-image\" alt=\"\" title=\"\"><\/figure>\n<p>Another day, another federal judge having to explain to the Trump administration that court orders are not optional suggestions.<\/p>\n<p>This time, the lecture came from Judge Matthew Kennelly of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, who found that the Department of Homeland Security failed to comply with a prior order directing it to unfreeze migrant support funds owed to Chicago, Denver, and Pima County, Arizona. Because you don\u2019t get to dodge your legal obligations just because you\u2019d rather not follow them.<\/p>\n<p>The case centers on reimbursement requests submitted by local governments under federal migrant support grants. Those requests were filed before Homeland Security formally terminated the grants, and the law requires agencies to process reimbursements within a statutory 30-day window. Instead of paying up or offering a lawful explanation for denying the requests, the administration froze the funds and then argued that it no longer had to meet the reimbursement deadline because the grants were now in \u201ccloseout.\u201d <\/p>\n<p>Judge Kennelly was not impressed.<\/p>\n<p>The governing regulation, he explained, \u201cdoes not contemplate allowing a federal agency to escape its regulatory obligations simply because it later terminates a grant.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>This ruling fits neatly into a <a href=\"https:\/\/abovethelaw.com\/2026\/01\/bush-appointed-federal-judge-to-ice-comply-with-court-courts-ice-youve-got-us-there\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">growing stack<\/a> of<a href=\"https:\/\/abovethelaw.com\/2026\/01\/dont-hide-the-ball-judge-puts-dojs-lawyers-on-blast\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\"> judicial orders<\/a> documenting the administration\u2019s increasingly casual relationship with the concept of a co-equal branch of government. Time and again, courts have had to spell out what should be basic civics: executive agencies don\u2019t get to ignore deadlines, rewrite regulations on the fly, or treat judicial oversight as a nuisance to be managed rather than authority to be respected.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.bloomberglaw.com\/public\/desktop\/document\/CityOfChicagoetalvDepartmentofHomelandSecurityetalDocketNo125cv05\/9?doc_id=X6OQ10OBKJA9NGO88QOAD62G4OA\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Judge Kennelly\u2019s order<\/a> doesn\u2019t do anything flashy. It doesn\u2019t grandstand. It simply insists that the government do what the law requires. But in the current climate, that insistence itself feels momentous.<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p><strong><em><img data-recalc-dims=\"1\" loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"wp-image-80083 alignright\" src=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/abovethelaw.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/4\/2021\/06\/IMG_5243-1-scaled-e1623338814705-620x568.jpg?resize=174%2C160&#038;ssl=1\" alt=\"\" width=\"174\" height=\"160\" title=\"\">Kathryn Rubino is a Senior Editor at Above the Law, host of <a href=\"https:\/\/open.spotify.com\/show\/1XC11QhFCWxWr4NQrk2sEA\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">The Jabot podcast<\/a>, and co-host of <a href=\"https:\/\/legaltalknetwork.com\/podcasts\/thinking-like-a-lawyer\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Thinking Like A Lawyer<\/a>. AtL tipsters are the best, so please connect with her. Feel free to email <a href=\"https:\/\/abovethelaw.com\/cdn-cgi\/l\/email-protection#157e74617d676c7b5574777a6370617d707974623b767a782a6660777f707661284c7a6067302725567a7960787b\" target=\"_blank&quot;\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer nofollow\">her<\/a> with any tips, questions, or comments and follow her on Twitter <a href=\"https:\/\/abovethelaw.com\/2026\/02\/federal-judge-reminds-dhs-that-court-orders-are-not-optional\/%E2%80%9C\/\/twitter.com\/Kathryn1%22%E2%80%9D\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">@Kathryn1<\/a>\u00a0or Mastodon <a href=\"https:\/\/mastodon.social\/@Kathryn1%22%22\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">@[email\u00a0protected].<\/a><\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Another day, another federal judge having to explain to the Trump administration that court orders are not optional suggestions. This time, the lecture came from Judge Matthew Kennelly of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, who found that the Department of Homeland Security failed to comply with a prior order directing [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":143711,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[16],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-143710","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-above_the_law"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/xira.com\/p\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/IMG_5243-1-scaled-e1623338814705-620x568-ZwlS6t.jpg?fit=620%2C568&ssl=1","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/xira.com\/p\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/143710","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/xira.com\/p\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/xira.com\/p\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/xira.com\/p\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/xira.com\/p\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=143710"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/xira.com\/p\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/143710\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/xira.com\/p\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/143711"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/xira.com\/p\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=143710"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/xira.com\/p\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=143710"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/xira.com\/p\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=143710"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}