{"id":148360,"date":"2026-04-09T15:20:56","date_gmt":"2026-04-09T23:20:56","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/xira.com\/p\/2026\/04\/09\/trump-sends-doj-after-nfl-to-avenge-his-own-public-humiliation-in-the-80s\/"},"modified":"2026-04-09T15:20:56","modified_gmt":"2026-04-09T23:20:56","slug":"trump-sends-doj-after-nfl-to-avenge-his-own-public-humiliation-in-the-80s","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/xira.com\/p\/2026\/04\/09\/trump-sends-doj-after-nfl-to-avenge-his-own-public-humiliation-in-the-80s\/","title":{"rendered":"Trump Sends DOJ After NFL To Avenge His Own Public Humiliation In The 80s"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>There are two major themes from the past couple months that you need to understand about this Department of Justice. First, the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.cnn.com\/2026\/02\/12\/politics\/doj-antitrust-chief-fired\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">administration forced out its own antitrust chief<\/a> and this week we learned that the senior litigators running the government\u2019s biggest antitrust matters are <a href=\"https:\/\/www.bloomberg.com\/news\/articles\/2026-04-08\/doj-top-antitrust-litigators-exit-after-ticketmaster-settlement\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">also bolting the Department of Justice<\/a> following the surprise settlement with Ticketmaster. The administration used the threat of arbitrary enforcement to <a href=\"https:\/\/www.bbc.com\/news\/articles\/ckg1klgl5dko\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">shunt a media consolidation deal toward a deep-pocketed donor<\/a>. And we learned that one right-wing lawyer has built a reputation for <a href=\"https:\/\/www.wsj.com\/us-news\/law\/lobbyists-antitrust-trump-davis-f6a02e04\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">successfully leaning on the administration to approve suspect deals for his clients<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>Second, after <a href=\"https:\/\/abovethelaw.com\/2026\/04\/pam-bondi-youre-fired\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Pam Bondi got fired<\/a>, her interim replacement Todd Blanche held a press conference where he said that <a href=\"https:\/\/www.reuters.com\/legal\/government\/acting-doj-chief-blanche-says-trump-has-right-influence-investigations-2026-04-07\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Donald Trump has the \u201cright\u201d to influence DOJ investigations<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>So, given that this DOJ doesn\u2019t give a shit about faithfully enforcing antitrust law, what are we to make of today\u2019s <a href=\"https:\/\/www.wsj.com\/sports\/football\/nfl-investigation-justice-department-8835a936\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\"><em>Wall Street Journal<\/em> exclusive report<\/a> that the Justice Department has opened an investigation into the National Football League over potential anticompetitive practices? Other than this being the dementia-fueled fulfillment of Trump\u2019s revenge arc against the NFL for never letting him own a team and publicly humiliating him in an antitrust trial 40 years ago.<\/p>\n<p>The DOJ is reportedly examining whether the NFL\u2019s media rights deals \u2014 which now spread games across broadcast networks, cable channels, and streaming platforms \u2014 are harming consumers by forcing fans to subscribe to an ever-expanding patchwork of services just to watch their team play. <\/p>\n<p>The Sports Broadcasting Act of 1961 granted the NFL a limited antitrust exemption so that teams could collectively negotiate TV deals. Back then, that meant games on free broadcast television. Now it means forking over cable and streaming subscription fees. Senator Mike Lee has questioned whether the statutory exemption should still apply when games end up behind paywalls, and FCC Chair Brendan Carr opened a public comment period in February examining how the streaming migration has affected consumers. <\/p>\n<p>The answer is \u201cyes, the exemption still applies until Congress does something about it.\u201d Apparently textualism isn\u2019t Lee\u2019s strong suit. <\/p>\n<p>But congressional action would require taking responsibility for something, which is anathema to a body that <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nbcnews.com\/politics\/congress\/republicans-block-effort-halt-trumps-war-iran-civilization-threat-rcna267345\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">won\u2019t even vote to <em>approve<\/em> Trump\u2019s attack on Iran<\/a>, and so lawmakers like Lee would prefer to sit back and beg the executive branch to do what he and his colleagues lack the courage to. <\/p>\n<p>Is the NFL a monopoly? Sure. In fact it\u2019s been adjudicated as one!<\/p>\n<p>When Donald Trump\u2019s bid to buy the Baltimore Colts was rejected in 1981, he bought the New Jersey Generals of the upstart USFL. But Trump didn\u2019t care about building a contender, he just wanted a litigation vehicle. In 1986, Trump convinced the other owners to abandon their successful spring schedule and go head-to-head with the NFL in the fall, a move that was intended to fail and set up a $1.69 billion antitrust suit. <\/p>\n<p>Who cooked up this doomed legal gambit? Roy Cohn. It was always Roy fucking Cohn.<\/p>\n<p>The jury found the NFL was indeed an illegal monopoly, but awarded the USFL\u2026 one dollar. Trebled under antitrust law, the USFL collected a grand total of $3. With interest, the NFL eventually paid $3.76. The USFL folded days later. If you wanted a preview of Trump the MASTER STRATEGIST in Iran, you needn\u2019t look much further than the time he launched an expensive assault to shake up a steady equilibrium, declared victory, and ended up with 3 bucks for his trouble.<\/p>\n<p>Trump tried to get into the NFL a couple times since then. He tried to buy the New England Patriots in 1988 and lost out on the Buffalo Bills in 2014. Former Commissioner Pete Rozelle reportedly told Trump to his face that he would never be allowed to own a franchise.<\/p>\n<p>So four decades later, Trump is the president of the United States and noticeably sundowning. Trump <a href=\"https:\/\/www.rollingstone.com\/politics\/politics-features\/trump-nfl-owner-buffalo-bills-1235105227\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">reportedly told ESPN\u2019s Stephen A. Smith<\/a> that if the league screwed him on his 2014 attempt to buy the Buffalo Bills that he\u2019d \u201crun for president\u201d and \u201cget them all back.\u201d It\u2019s not really a conspiracy theory when they\u2019ve been telling reporters about it for over a decade.<\/p>\n<p>Speaking of reporters, it might not be a coincidence that the <em>Wall Street Journal<\/em> \u2014 owned by Rupert Murdoch, who also owns Fox, which is currently in a leverage war with the NFL over broadcast rights fees \u2014 got an exclusive. Fox has been <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nbcsports.com\/nfl\/profootballtalk\/rumor-mill\/news\/rupert-murdochs-wall-street-journal-takes-aim-at-nfls-antitrust-exemption\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">fairly openly lobbying the FCC and Congress<\/a> to strip the NFL\u2019s antitrust exemption so the league can\u2019t squeeze networks for more money. What a coincidence that Murdoch\u2019s newspaper had an inside line on the DOJ deciding to heed Murdoch\u2019s plea.<\/p>\n<p>The NFL is absolutely using its power to squeeze the media and the media is passing that on to the consumer. But this administration just let Ticketmaster\u2019s monopoly walk and put themselves behind a consumer crushing media merger. They don\u2019t care about sports fans getting gouged. This is Trump\u2019s revenge tour for the league humiliating him and permanently barring him from the cool kids\u2019 table.<\/p>\n<hr>\n<p><strong><em><img data-recalc-dims=\"1\" loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignright  wp-image-443318\" src=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/abovethelaw.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/11\/Headshot-300x200.jpg?resize=188%2C125&#038;ssl=1\" alt=\"Headshot\" width=\"188\" height=\"125\" title=\"\"><a href=\"http:\/\/abovethelaw.com\/author\/joe-patrice\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener nofollow\">Joe Patrice<\/a>\u00a0is a senior editor at Above the Law and co-host of <a href=\"http:\/\/legaltalknetwork.com\/podcasts\/thinking-like-a-lawyer\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener nofollow\">Thinking Like A Lawyer<\/a>. Feel free to\u00a0<a href=\"mailto:joepatrice@abovethelaw.com\">email<\/a> any tips, questions, or comments. Follow him on\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/josephpatrice\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener nofollow\">Twitter<\/a>\u00a0or <a href=\"https:\/\/bsky.app\/profile\/joepatrice.bsky.social\" rel=\"noopener nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Bluesky<\/a> if you\u2019re interested in law, politics, and a healthy dose of college sports news. Joe also serves as a <a href=\"https:\/\/www.rpnexecsearch.com\/josephpatrice\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener nofollow\">Managing Director at RPN Executive Search<\/a>.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The post <a href=\"https:\/\/abovethelaw.com\/2026\/04\/trump-sends-doj-after-nfl-to-avenge-his-own-public-humiliation-in-the-80s\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Trump Sends DOJ After NFL To Avenge His Own Public Humiliation In The 80s<\/a> appeared first on <a href=\"https:\/\/abovethelaw.com\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Above the Law<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>There are two major themes from the past couple months that you need to understand about this Department of Justice. First, the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.cnn.com\/2026\/02\/12\/politics\/doj-antitrust-chief-fired\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">administration forced out its own antitrust chief<\/a> and this week we learned that the senior litigators running the government\u2019s biggest antitrust matters are <a href=\"https:\/\/www.bloomberg.com\/news\/articles\/2026-04-08\/doj-top-antitrust-litigators-exit-after-ticketmaster-settlement\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">also bolting the Department of Justice<\/a> following the surprise settlement with Ticketmaster. The administration used the threat of arbitrary enforcement to <a href=\"https:\/\/www.bbc.com\/news\/articles\/ckg1klgl5dko\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">shunt a media consolidation deal toward a deep-pocketed donor<\/a>. And we learned that one right-wing lawyer has built a reputation for <a href=\"https:\/\/www.wsj.com\/us-news\/law\/lobbyists-antitrust-trump-davis-f6a02e04\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">successfully leaning on the administration to approve suspect deals for his clients<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>Second, after <a href=\"https:\/\/abovethelaw.com\/2026\/04\/pam-bondi-youre-fired\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Pam Bondi got fired<\/a>, her interim replacement Todd Blanche held a press conference where he said that <a href=\"https:\/\/www.reuters.com\/legal\/government\/acting-doj-chief-blanche-says-trump-has-right-influence-investigations-2026-04-07\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Donald Trump has the \u201cright\u201d to influence DOJ investigations<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>So, given that this DOJ doesn\u2019t give a shit about faithfully enforcing antitrust law, what are we to make of today\u2019s <a href=\"https:\/\/www.wsj.com\/sports\/football\/nfl-investigation-justice-department-8835a936\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\"><em>Wall Street Journal<\/em> exclusive report<\/a> that the Justice Department has opened an investigation into the National Football League over potential anticompetitive practices? Other than this being the dementia-fueled fulfillment of Trump\u2019s revenge arc against the NFL for never letting him own a team and publicly humiliating him in an antitrust trial 40 years ago.<\/p>\n<p>The DOJ is reportedly examining whether the NFL\u2019s media rights deals \u2014 which now spread games across broadcast networks, cable channels, and streaming platforms \u2014 are harming consumers by forcing fans to subscribe to an ever-expanding patchwork of services just to watch their team play. <\/p>\n<p>The Sports Broadcasting Act of 1961 granted the NFL a limited antitrust exemption so that teams could collectively negotiate TV deals. Back then, that meant games on free broadcast television. Now it means forking over cable and streaming subscription fees. Senator Mike Lee has questioned whether the statutory exemption should still apply when games end up behind paywalls, and FCC Chair Brendan Carr opened a public comment period in February examining how the streaming migration has affected consumers. <\/p>\n<p>The answer is \u201cyes, the exemption still applies until Congress does something about it.\u201d Apparently textualism isn\u2019t Lee\u2019s strong suit. <\/p>\n<p>But congressional action would require taking responsibility for something, which is anathema to a body that <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nbcnews.com\/politics\/congress\/republicans-block-effort-halt-trumps-war-iran-civilization-threat-rcna267345\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">won\u2019t even vote to <em>approve<\/em> Trump\u2019s attack on Iran<\/a>, and so lawmakers like Lee would prefer to sit back and beg the executive branch to do what he and his colleagues lack the courage to. <\/p>\n<p>Is the NFL a monopoly? Sure. In fact it\u2019s been adjudicated as one!<\/p>\n<p>When Donald Trump\u2019s bid to buy the Baltimore Colts was rejected in 1981, he bought the New Jersey Generals of the upstart USFL. But Trump didn\u2019t care about building a contender, he just wanted a litigation vehicle. In 1986, Trump convinced the other owners to abandon their successful spring schedule and go head-to-head with the NFL in the fall, a move that was intended to fail and set up a $1.69 billion antitrust suit. <\/p>\n<p>Who cooked up this doomed legal gambit? Roy Cohn. It was always Roy fucking Cohn.<\/p>\n<p>The jury found the NFL was indeed an illegal monopoly, but awarded the USFL\u2026 one dollar. Trebled under antitrust law, the USFL collected a grand total of $3. With interest, the NFL eventually paid $3.76. The USFL folded days later. If you wanted a preview of Trump the MASTER STRATEGIST in Iran, you needn\u2019t look much further than the time he launched an expensive assault to shake up a steady equilibrium, declared victory, and ended up with 3 bucks for his trouble.<\/p>\n<p>Trump tried to get into the NFL a couple times since then. He tried to buy the New England Patriots in 1988 and lost out on the Buffalo Bills in 2014. Former Commissioner Pete Rozelle reportedly told Trump to his face that he would never be allowed to own a franchise.<\/p>\n<p>So four decades later, Trump is the president of the United States and noticeably sundowning. Trump <a href=\"https:\/\/www.rollingstone.com\/politics\/politics-features\/trump-nfl-owner-buffalo-bills-1235105227\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">reportedly told ESPN\u2019s Stephen A. Smith<\/a> that if the league screwed him on his 2014 attempt to buy the Buffalo Bills that he\u2019d \u201crun for president\u201d and \u201cget them all back.\u201d It\u2019s not really a conspiracy theory when they\u2019ve been telling reporters about it for over a decade.<\/p>\n<p>Speaking of reporters, it might not be a coincidence that the <em>Wall Street Journal<\/em> \u2014 owned by Rupert Murdoch, who also owns Fox, which is currently in a leverage war with the NFL over broadcast rights fees \u2014 got an exclusive. Fox has been <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nbcsports.com\/nfl\/profootballtalk\/rumor-mill\/news\/rupert-murdochs-wall-street-journal-takes-aim-at-nfls-antitrust-exemption\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">fairly openly lobbying the FCC and Congress<\/a> to strip the NFL\u2019s antitrust exemption so the league can\u2019t squeeze networks for more money. What a coincidence that Murdoch\u2019s newspaper had an inside line on the DOJ deciding to heed Murdoch\u2019s plea.<\/p>\n<p>The NFL is absolutely using its power to squeeze the media and the media is passing that on to the consumer. But this administration just let Ticketmaster\u2019s monopoly walk and put themselves behind a consumer crushing media merger. They don\u2019t care about sports fans getting gouged. This is Trump\u2019s revenge tour for the league humiliating him and permanently barring him from the cool kids\u2019 table.<\/p>\n<hr>\n<p><strong><em><img data-recalc-dims=\"1\" loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignright  wp-image-443318\" src=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/abovethelaw.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/11\/Headshot-300x200.jpg?resize=188%2C125&#038;ssl=1\" alt=\"Headshot\" width=\"188\" height=\"125\" title=\"\"><a href=\"http:\/\/abovethelaw.com\/author\/joe-patrice\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener nofollow\">Joe Patrice<\/a>\u00a0is a senior editor at Above the Law and co-host of <a href=\"http:\/\/legaltalknetwork.com\/podcasts\/thinking-like-a-lawyer\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener nofollow\">Thinking Like A Lawyer<\/a>. Feel free to\u00a0<a href=\"mailto:joepatrice@abovethelaw.com\">email<\/a> any tips, questions, or comments. Follow him on\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/josephpatrice\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener nofollow\">Twitter<\/a>\u00a0or <a href=\"https:\/\/bsky.app\/profile\/joepatrice.bsky.social\" rel=\"noopener nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Bluesky<\/a> if you\u2019re interested in law, politics, and a healthy dose of college sports news. Joe also serves as a <a href=\"https:\/\/www.rpnexecsearch.com\/josephpatrice\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener nofollow\">Managing Director at RPN Executive Search<\/a>.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The post <a href=\"https:\/\/abovethelaw.com\/2026\/04\/trump-sends-doj-after-nfl-to-avenge-his-own-public-humiliation-in-the-80s\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Trump Sends DOJ After NFL To Avenge His Own Public Humiliation In The 80s<\/a> appeared first on <a href=\"https:\/\/abovethelaw.com\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Above the Law<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>There are two major themes from the past couple months that you need to understand about this Department of Justice. First, the administration forced out its own antitrust chief and this week we learned that the senior litigators running the government\u2019s biggest antitrust matters are also bolting the Department of Justice following the surprise settlement [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[16],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-148360","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-above_the_law"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/xira.com\/p\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/148360","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/xira.com\/p\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/xira.com\/p\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/xira.com\/p\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/xira.com\/p\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=148360"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/xira.com\/p\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/148360\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/xira.com\/p\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=148360"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/xira.com\/p\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=148360"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/xira.com\/p\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=148360"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}