{"id":152661,"date":"2026-05-22T10:29:00","date_gmt":"2026-05-22T18:29:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/xira.com\/p\/2026\/05\/22\/trump-fcc-using-false-claims-of-immigrant-fraud-to-drive-up-costs-of-broadband-for-everyone\/"},"modified":"2026-05-22T10:29:00","modified_gmt":"2026-05-22T18:29:00","slug":"trump-fcc-using-false-claims-of-immigrant-fraud-to-drive-up-costs-of-broadband-for-everyone","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/xira.com\/p\/2026\/05\/22\/trump-fcc-using-false-claims-of-immigrant-fraud-to-drive-up-costs-of-broadband-for-everyone\/","title":{"rendered":"Trump FCC Using False Claims Of Immigrant Fraud To Drive Up Costs Of Broadband For Everyone"},"content":{"rendered":"

Back in February the Trump FCC announced it was launching new \u201creforms<\/a>\u201d of a major bipartisan FCC program that helps poor people afford broadband. Dubbed\u00a0Lifeline<\/a>, the program provides a modest $9.25 stipend to help low-income Americans afford either broadband or phone service.<\/p>\n

Lifeline, developed and supported as a popular bipartisan initiative, is one of countless government programs being gutted by the Trump administration under the pretense of reform and cost savings. Earlier this year, FCC boss Brendan Carr falsely claimed that the \u201creform\u201d (read: destruction) of the program was necessary due to a bunch of fraud by immigrants. From his\u00a0original press statement<\/a>:<\/p>\n

\n

\u201cLifeline providers received nearly $5 million in federal dollars to provide phone or Internet service to more than 116,000 dead people in the three optout states. Over 80% of those scams took place in California alone. That type of waste, fraud, and abuse is completely unacceptable.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

This was, you\u2019ll be surprised to learn, a lie. One that mirrors similarly racist claims made by the Trump administration as it targets what\u2019s left of the U.S. social safety net. It didn\u2019t take long for Carr\u2019s lie that \u201cCalifornia immigrants are stealing taxpayer dollars\u201d to bounce around the right wing propagandaverse.<\/p>\n

But as the California Public Utilities Commission noted shortly thereafter, the 116,000 people cited\u00a0died while on the program<\/strong>. There was no fraud. There\u2019s not even coherent evidence they were immigrants (as if that would matter one way or the other):<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n

The Trump FCC reforms aren\u2019t finalized yet. There\u2019s first a public comment period where Brendan Carr will pretend to listen to outside parties and the public. So groups like Public Knowledge and the National Digital Inclusion Alliance (NDIA) recently\u00a0filed their complaints<\/a>\u00a0about the proposed changes with the FCC (spotted first by\u00a0Light Reading<\/a>).<\/p>\n

They make several excellent points, one being that historically, most of the fraud occurring in the Lifeline program has been at the hands of private companies:<\/p>\n

\n

\u201cThe Q-Link case in 2025, the Armstrong Group in 2024, and the 2022 San Francisco whistleblower complaint each illustrate that providers, not eligible and subscribing Lifeline households, are the primary entities engaging in fraud and abuse concerns within USF programs.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

Brendan Carr\u2019s policies generally involve a strange fusion of\u00a0racism<\/a>\u00a0and\u00a0gutting oversight of corporations<\/a>. U.S. broadband wouldn\u2019t be so expensive if regulators like Brendan Carr actually believed in holding regional monopolies accountable. Instead, Carr\u2019s policies generally involve mindless deregulation of industry, resulting in muted competition, high prices, spotty access, and poor customer service.<\/p>\n

Groups say Carr\u2019s goal of imposing new Lifeline restrictions are particularly problematic because only somewhere between 19 and 22 percent of all eligible homes sign up for the program, suggesting it could benefit from improved outreach and education, not cumbersome new barriers to participation.<\/p>\n

The groups also stated they were \u201cextremely concerned\u201d about the potential that data collected will be used to harass minority Americans:<\/p>\n

\n

\u201cFor a program that garnered bipartisan support and cooperation for decades, it is difficult to ignore the timing of this proposal alongside expanded federal data-sharing initiatives targeting immigrant communities among other anti-immigrant strategies deployed by the Trump Administration.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

The Trump administration attacks on Lifeline mirror other simultaneous efforts to make broadband less affordable for everyone, whether they\u2019re fresh immigrants or Trump supporters in the deepest red state. In just the last year or two, Republicans and the Trump administration have:<\/p>\n