{"id":160761,"date":"2026-08-17T13:25:15","date_gmt":"2026-08-17T21:25:15","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/xira.com\/p\/2026\/08\/17\/a-tribute-or-a-tactic-the-lindsay-clancy-prosecutors-hair-bows-could-backfire\/"},"modified":"2026-08-17T13:25:15","modified_gmt":"2026-08-17T21:25:15","slug":"a-tribute-or-a-tactic-the-lindsay-clancy-prosecutors-hair-bows-could-backfire","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/xira.com\/p\/2026\/08\/17\/a-tribute-or-a-tactic-the-lindsay-clancy-prosecutors-hair-bows-could-backfire\/","title":{"rendered":"A Tribute, Or A Tactic? The Lindsay Clancy Prosecutor\u2019s Hair Bows Could Backfire"},"content":{"rendered":"<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The murder trial of Lindsay Clancy, accused of strangling her three children, has gripped the nation. Social media has been filled with true crime sleuths at home finding alternate theories of the case and postpartum advocates pointing out the ways the system failed the entire Clancy family and just gossips getting the ick over how quickly the dad, Patrick Clancy, remarried. And of course, there\u2019s the genuine grief over the loss of three young lives, Cora, 5, Dawson, 3, and Callan, 8 months. But running alongside those questions is a smaller one that has become its own conversation, and a genuinely useful one for anyone who practices law. Prosecutor Shanan Buckingham has spent weeks in Plymouth Superior Court in a rotating collection of hair bows, and the widely circulated theory, floated by former prosecutor Margaret McLean <a href=\"https:\/\/www.tag24.com\/en\/justice\/murder\/lindsay-clancy-trial-former-prosecutor-tackles-hair-bow-drama-a-little-too-obvious-3524292\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">on NBC10 Boston<\/a>, is that they\u2019re a tribute to Cora, the five-year-old who loved bows.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">McLean, who has been livestreaming the trial daily, believes the intent is \u201cpure\u201d but <a href=\"https:\/\/www.tag24.com\/en\/justice\/murder\/lindsay-clancy-trial-former-prosecutor-tackles-hair-bow-drama-a-little-too-obvious-3524292\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">called the bows<\/a> \u201ca little too obvious,\u201d adding that it\u2019s \u201csomething I would not have done as a prosecutor.\u201d New Jersey defense attorney David Bruno, himself a former prosecutor, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.courttv.com\/news\/terrible-job-attorneys-social-media-watchers-join-chorus-critical-of-lindsay-clancy-prosecutors\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">went further<\/a>, calling the choice \u201cimproper\u201d and warning that an appellate court \u201cmay have a problem with that.\u201d Criminal defense attorney Mark Eiglarsh split the difference: not technically improper, sure, but \u201ca significant courtroom optics problem.\u201d<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Social media, predictably, has fewer reservations. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.courttv.com\/news\/terrible-job-attorneys-social-media-watchers-join-chorus-critical-of-lindsay-clancy-prosecutors\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">One TikTok user<\/a> cut right to it, calling the bows \u201ca cheap gimmick and a tactic to manipulate the jury.\u201d Others have gone full forensic, compiling montages cataloging every bow Buckingham has worn, day by day, like it\u2019s a fashion week no one asked for.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Over on <a href=\"https:\/\/www.reddit.com\/r\/LawBitchesWithTaste\/comments\/1vhaue1\/hair_bows_in_court\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">r\/LawBitchesWithTaste<\/a>, the skepticism ran deep even among people plainly not rooting for the defense. One commenter who <a href=\"https:\/\/www.reddit.com\/r\/LawBitchesWithTaste\/comments\/1vhaue1\/comment\/p23se2f\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">identified as a prosecutor<\/a> said she had once honored a young victim by quietly wearing the child\u2019s favorite color, saying, \u201cno one would have known but her family.\u201d That\u2019s the key \u2014 the tribute that works is the one the jury never clocks. Another poster <a href=\"https:\/\/www.reddit.com\/r\/LawBitchesWithTaste\/comments\/1vhaue1\/comment\/p23p0n0\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">found the bows<\/a> \u201creally inappropriate\u201d and read it as an over-the-top bid for sympathy in a case that needs exactly none \u2014 no one, she pointed out, is at risk of forgetting that a sweet little girl who loved bows was murdered. A third <a href=\"https:\/\/www.reddit.com\/r\/LawBitchesWithTaste\/comments\/1vhaue1\/comment\/p23r2q3\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">put the strategic problem plainly<\/a>: a juror might read the fashion choice as cynical, and decide the prosecution was \u201cgoing way too hard as to be disingenuous,\u201d distracting from its own case. When the courtroom-tasteful crowd and the true-crime feeds land in the same place, that\u2019s something.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">And here is where I\u2019ll cop to my bias: as a grown ass woman who owns more bows than any adult reasonably should and wears them without a shred of shame, I want to be on the side of the bow. I really do. But watching a prosecutor pin a dead five-year-old\u2019s favorite thing to her own head, in front of the jury deciding that child\u2019s mother\u2019s fate, day after day, I cannot get there. <\/p>\n<hr>\n<p><strong><em><img data-recalc-dims=\"1\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\" class=\" wp-image-80083 alignright\" src=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/abovethelaw.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/4\/2021\/06\/IMG_5243-1-scaled-e1623338814705-620x568.jpg?resize=174%2C160&#038;ssl=1\" alt=\"\" width=\"174\" height=\"160\" title=\"\"><\/p>\n<p><strong><em>Kathryn Rubino is a Senior Editor at Above the Law, host of\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/open.spotify.com\/show\/1XC11QhFCWxWr4NQrk2sEA\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener nofollow\">The Jabot podcast<\/a>, and co-host of\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/legaltalknetwork.com\/podcasts\/thinking-like-a-lawyer\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener nofollow\">Thinking Like A Lawyer<\/a>. AtL tipsters are the best, so please connect with her. Feel free to email\u00a0<a href=\"mailto:kathryn@abovethelaw.com?subject=Your%20Column\">her<\/a>\u00a0with any tips, questions, or comments and follow her on Twitter\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/Kathryn1\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener nofollow\">@Kathryn1<\/a>\u00a0or Bluesky\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/bsky.app\/profile\/kathryn1.bsky.social\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">@Kathryn1<\/a><\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The post <a href=\"https:\/\/abovethelaw.com\/2026\/08\/a-tribute-or-a-tactic-the-lindsay-clancy-prosecutors-hair-bows-could-backfire\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">A Tribute, Or A Tactic? The Lindsay Clancy Prosecutor\u2019s Hair Bows Could Backfire<\/a> appeared first on <a href=\"https:\/\/abovethelaw.com\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Above the Law<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p><\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<figure class=\"post-single__featured-image post-single__featured-image--medium alignright\"><img data-recalc-dims=\"1\" loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"300\" height=\"300\" src=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/abovethelaw.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/4\/2026\/08\/GettyImages-2261402581-300x300.jpg?resize=300%2C300&#038;ssl=1\" class=\"attachment-medium size-medium wp-post-image\" alt=\"\" title=\"\"><\/figure>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The murder trial of Lindsay Clancy, accused of strangling her three children, has gripped the nation. Social media has been filled with true crime sleuths at home finding alternate theories of the case and postpartum advocates pointing out the ways the system failed the entire Clancy family and just gossips getting the ick over how quickly the dad, Patrick Clancy, remarried. And of course, there\u2019s the genuine grief over the loss of three young lives, Cora, 5, Dawson, 3, and Callan, 8 months. But running alongside those questions is a smaller one that has become its own conversation, and a genuinely useful one for anyone who practices law. Prosecutor Shanan Buckingham has spent weeks in Plymouth Superior Court in a rotating collection of hair bows, and the widely circulated theory, floated by former prosecutor Margaret McLean <a href=\"https:\/\/www.tag24.com\/en\/justice\/murder\/lindsay-clancy-trial-former-prosecutor-tackles-hair-bow-drama-a-little-too-obvious-3524292\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">on NBC10 Boston<\/a>, is that they\u2019re a tribute to Cora, the five-year-old who loved bows.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">McLean, who has been livestreaming the trial daily, believes the intent is \u201cpure\u201d but <a href=\"https:\/\/www.tag24.com\/en\/justice\/murder\/lindsay-clancy-trial-former-prosecutor-tackles-hair-bow-drama-a-little-too-obvious-3524292\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">called the bows<\/a> \u201ca little too obvious,\u201d adding that it\u2019s \u201csomething I would not have done as a prosecutor.\u201d New Jersey defense attorney David Bruno, himself a former prosecutor, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.courttv.com\/news\/terrible-job-attorneys-social-media-watchers-join-chorus-critical-of-lindsay-clancy-prosecutors\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">went further<\/a>, calling the choice \u201cimproper\u201d and warning that an appellate court \u201cmay have a problem with that.\u201d Criminal defense attorney Mark Eiglarsh split the difference: not technically improper, sure, but \u201ca significant courtroom optics problem.\u201d<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Social media, predictably, has fewer reservations. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.courttv.com\/news\/terrible-job-attorneys-social-media-watchers-join-chorus-critical-of-lindsay-clancy-prosecutors\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">One TikTok user<\/a> cut right to it, calling the bows \u201ca cheap gimmick and a tactic to manipulate the jury.\u201d Others have gone full forensic, compiling montages cataloging every bow Buckingham has worn, day by day, like it\u2019s a fashion week no one asked for.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Over on <a href=\"https:\/\/www.reddit.com\/r\/LawBitchesWithTaste\/comments\/1vhaue1\/hair_bows_in_court\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">r\/LawBitchesWithTaste<\/a>, the skepticism ran deep even among people plainly not rooting for the defense. One commenter who <a href=\"https:\/\/www.reddit.com\/r\/LawBitchesWithTaste\/comments\/1vhaue1\/comment\/p23se2f\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">identified as a prosecutor<\/a> said she had once honored a young victim by quietly wearing the child\u2019s favorite color, saying, \u201cno one would have known but her family.\u201d That\u2019s the key \u2014 the tribute that works is the one the jury never clocks. Another poster <a href=\"https:\/\/www.reddit.com\/r\/LawBitchesWithTaste\/comments\/1vhaue1\/comment\/p23p0n0\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">found the bows<\/a> \u201creally inappropriate\u201d and read it as an over-the-top bid for sympathy in a case that needs exactly none \u2014 no one, she pointed out, is at risk of forgetting that a sweet little girl who loved bows was murdered. A third <a href=\"https:\/\/www.reddit.com\/r\/LawBitchesWithTaste\/comments\/1vhaue1\/comment\/p23r2q3\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">put the strategic problem plainly<\/a>: a juror might read the fashion choice as cynical, and decide the prosecution was \u201cgoing way too hard as to be disingenuous,\u201d distracting from its own case. When the courtroom-tasteful crowd and the true-crime feeds land in the same place, that\u2019s something.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">And here is where I\u2019ll cop to my bias: as a grown ass woman who owns more bows than any adult reasonably should and wears them without a shred of shame, I want to be on the side of the bow. I really do. But watching a prosecutor pin a dead five-year-old\u2019s favorite thing to her own head, in front of the jury deciding that child\u2019s mother\u2019s fate, day after day, I cannot get there. <\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p><strong><em><img data-recalc-dims=\"1\" loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"wp-image-80083 alignright\" src=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/abovethelaw.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/4\/2021\/06\/IMG_5243-1-scaled-e1623338814705-620x568.jpg?resize=174%2C160&#038;ssl=1\" alt=\"\" width=\"174\" height=\"160\" title=\"\"><strong><em>Kathryn Rubino is a Senior Editor at Above the Law, host of\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/open.spotify.com\/show\/1XC11QhFCWxWr4NQrk2sEA\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener nofollow\">The Jabot podcast<\/a>, and co-host of\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/legaltalknetwork.com\/podcasts\/thinking-like-a-lawyer\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener nofollow\">Thinking Like A Lawyer<\/a>. AtL tipsters are the best, so please connect with her. Feel free to email\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/abovethelaw.com\/cdn-cgi\/l\/email-protection#d3b8b2a7bba1aabd93b2b1bca5b6a7bbb6bfb2a4fdb0bcbeeca0a6b1b9b6b0a7ee8abca6a1f6e1e390bcbfa6bebd\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">her<\/a>\u00a0with any tips, questions, or comments and follow her on Twitter\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/Kathryn1\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener nofollow\">@Kathryn1<\/a>\u00a0or Bluesky\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/bsky.app\/profile\/kathryn1.bsky.social\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">@Kathryn1<\/a><\/em><\/strong><\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The murder trial of Lindsay Clancy, accused of strangling her three children, has gripped the nation. Social media has been filled with true crime sleuths at home finding alternate theories of the case and postpartum advocates pointing out the ways the system failed the entire Clancy family and just gossips getting the ick over how [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":160740,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[16],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-160761","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-above_the_law"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/xira.com\/p\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/IMG_5243-1-scaled-e1623338814705-620x568-eSi4eC.jpg?fit=620%2C568&ssl=1","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/xira.com\/p\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/160761","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/xira.com\/p\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/xira.com\/p\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/xira.com\/p\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/xira.com\/p\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=160761"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/xira.com\/p\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/160761\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/xira.com\/p\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/160740"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/xira.com\/p\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=160761"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/xira.com\/p\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=160761"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/xira.com\/p\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=160761"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}