Arthur Hellman, a law professor who studies federal appeals courts, said an en banc ruling in an assault weapons case demonstrates that litigators should not assume a judge’s party affiliation will predict case outcomes in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.
Arthur Hellman, a law professor who studies federal appeals courts, said an en banc ruling in an assault weapons case demonstrates that litigators should not assume a judge’s party affiliation will predict case outcomes in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.
