The court found that Sonate Corp. had adequately established a limited amount of lost profits from its existing business but that its larger damages claim—which was tied to a proposed product expansion called Vegadelphia 2.0—was too speculative and lacked a sufficient casual connection to Beyond Meat’s infringement.
The court found that Sonate Corp. had adequately established a limited amount of lost profits from its existing business but that its larger damages claim—which was tied to a proposed product expansion called Vegadelphia 2.0—was too speculative and lacked a sufficient casual connection to Beyond Meat’s infringement.
