“At the Supreme Court, we benefited from significant experience presenting arguments about a complicated statutory scheme to the Justices, who are generalists. We situated the case in the Court’s effort over recent decades to curtail the doctrine of implied private rights of action. That framing primed the Court to look with skepticism at the investors’ argument.”
“At the Supreme Court, we benefited from significant experience presenting arguments about a complicated statutory scheme to the Justices, who are generalists. We situated the case in the Court’s effort over recent decades to curtail the doctrine of implied private rights of action. That framing primed the Court to look with skepticism at the investors’ argument.”
