Ed. Note: A weekly roundup of just a few items from Howard Bashman’s How Appealing blog, the Web’s first blog devoted to appellate litigation. Check out these stories and more at How Appealing.
“Judge Vows to End Trump Administration’s Noncompliance ‘One Way or Another’; The federal judge identified 210 orders issued in 143 cases in Minnesota in which he said Immigration and Customs Enforcement officials had not complied with court orders”: Mitch Smith, Ernesto Londoño, and Mattathias Schwartz of The New York Times have this report.
“Bonus 212: The Supreme Court is Not ‘Reining in’ Executive Power; The Court’s defenders claim the tariffs ruling is part of a trend in which the justices are reining in President Trump and (re-)empowering Congress; The full dataset is overwhelmingly to the contrary.” Steve Vladeck has this post at his “One First” Substack site.
“Trump’s next tariff fight: Keeping the money; After Trump’s Supreme Court tariff defeat, administration officials are devising legal strategies that would let the president keep some — or maybe even most — of the revenue, five people familiar with the conversations told POLITICO.” Megan Messerly and Daniel
“Testimony Offers New Details on Justice Dept. Role in Abrego Garcia Prosecution”: Alan Feuer of The New York Times has this report.
“You Guys Look Miserable: The Supreme Court’s silliest tradition is sending a handful of justices to sit through a two-hour State of the Union without changing their facial expressions.” Jay Willis has this essay online at Balls and Strikes.
The post How Appealing Weekly Roundup appeared first on Above the Law.
Ed. Note: A weekly roundup of just a few items from Howard Bashman’s How Appealing blog, the Web’s first blog devoted to appellate litigation. Check out these stories and more at How Appealing.
“Judge Vows to End Trump Administration’s Noncompliance ‘One Way or Another’; The federal judge identified 210 orders issued in 143 cases in Minnesota in which he said Immigration and Customs Enforcement officials had not complied with court orders”: Mitch Smith, Ernesto Londoño, and Mattathias Schwartz of The New York Times have this report.
“Bonus 212: The Supreme Court is Not ‘Reining in’ Executive Power; The Court’s defenders claim the tariffs ruling is part of a trend in which the justices are reining in President Trump and (re-)empowering Congress; The full dataset is overwhelmingly to the contrary.” Steve Vladeck has this post at his “One First” Substack site.
“Trump’s next tariff fight: Keeping the money; After Trump’s Supreme Court tariff defeat, administration officials are devising legal strategies that would let the president keep some — or maybe even most — of the revenue, five people familiar with the conversations told POLITICO.” Megan Messerly and Daniel
“Testimony Offers New Details on Justice Dept. Role in Abrego Garcia Prosecution”: Alan Feuer of The New York Times has this report.
“You Guys Look Miserable: The Supreme Court’s silliest tradition is sending a handful of justices to sit through a two-hour State of the Union without changing their facial expressions.” Jay Willis has this essay online at Balls and Strikes.
The post How Appealing Weekly Roundup appeared first on Above the Law.
