Afridi argued on appeal that the MRI footage was real evidence rather than a demonstrative aid, looking to overturn the jury’s February 2024 defense verdict, but Mikva and Justice Thaddeus L. Wilson disagreed. Justice Sharon Oden Johnson dissented from the majority.
Afridi argued on appeal that the MRI footage was real evidence rather than a demonstrative aid, looking to overturn the jury’s February 2024 defense verdict, but Mikva and Justice Thaddeus L. Wilson disagreed. Justice Sharon Oden Johnson dissented from the majority.
