“As to the additional fees defendants argue fall ‘outside the scope of the receivership,’ it is clear that defendants seek to relitigate the initial appointment of the receivership, which the court determined was definitively necessary,” the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois said.
“As to the additional fees defendants argue fall ‘outside the scope of the receivership,’ it is clear that defendants seek to relitigate the initial appointment of the receivership, which the court determined was definitively necessary,” the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois said.
