“The county did not need to receive an engraved notice to understand that its actions—taking private property without providing just compensation—constituted a ‘classic’ violation of the Fifth Amendment’s Takings Clause,” a federal judge said.
“The county did not need to receive an engraved notice to understand that its actions—taking private property without providing just compensation—constituted a ‘classic’ violation of the Fifth Amendment’s Takings Clause,” a federal judge said.
