The majority “does a disservice to all concerned by distorting Article III standing and ripeness principles to issue a ruling that contributes to preelection chaos instead of quashing it, and by using its equitable authority to facilitate a patently inequitable result,” Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson wrote in her solo dissent.
The majority “does a disservice to all concerned by distorting Article III standing and ripeness principles to issue a ruling that contributes to preelection chaos instead of quashing it, and by using its equitable authority to facilitate a patently inequitable result,” Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson wrote in her solo dissent.
