In a case that was remanded back by the Supreme Court, a U.S. district court found the toy was a parody that did not infringe on Jack Daniel’s trademark, but still tarnished the whiskey brand, noting “human consumption and canine excrement do not mix.
In a case that was remanded back by the Supreme Court, a U.S. district court found the toy was a parody that did not infringe on Jack Daniel’s trademark, but still tarnished the whiskey brand, noting “human consumption and canine excrement do not mix.
