“Here, the constitutional questions raised by Landerer’s substantive and procedural due process claims are not beyond debate, as shown by the various courts that addressed the same issue in differing manners, but ultimately reaching the conclusion that policies not requiring notice of a student’s requested gender pronoun is not violative of the Constitution, U.S. District Judge Jennifer P. Wilson said.
“Here, the constitutional questions raised by Landerer’s substantive and procedural due process claims are not beyond debate, as shown by the various courts that addressed the same issue in differing manners, but ultimately reaching the conclusion that policies not requiring notice of a student’s requested gender pronoun is not violative of the Constitution, U.S. District Judge Jennifer P. Wilson said.
