The Ninth Circuit panel rejected challenges from Elizabeth Holmes and Ranesh Balwani, who questioned the propriety of testimony from former employees of the failed blood-testing company and said any errors in calculating restitution for investors were harmless because the award was warranted to make them “whole.”

legal news

fbshare20 fblike20 pinterest20 stumble20  rss20  

The Ninth Circuit panel rejected challenges from Elizabeth Holmes and Ranesh Balwani, who questioned the propriety of testimony from former employees of the failed blood-testing company and said any errors in calculating restitution for investors were harmless because the award was warranted to make them “whole.”

legal news

fbshare20 fblike20 pinterest20 stumble20  rss20