Six corporate law professors argue that reversing the Chancery decision would reopen a door the Supreme Court closed last year in its In re Match Group decision, which set a precedent on “cleansing” mechanisms required in conflicted controller transactions.
Six corporate law professors argue that reversing the Chancery decision would reopen a door the Supreme Court closed last year in its In re Match Group decision, which set a precedent on “cleansing” mechanisms required in conflicted controller transactions.
