“Given the strong evidentiary basis for the verdict and what we believe to be clear legal error in the court’s order, we will be appealing the decision to the First Circuit Court of Appeals. The ADA’s interactive process requirement is a critical protection that ensures employers make decisions based on dialogue and facts, not assumptions,” said plaintiff’s attorney, Andrew Rozynski, of Eisenberg & Baum.
“Given the strong evidentiary basis for the verdict and what we believe to be clear legal error in the court’s order, we will be appealing the decision to the First Circuit Court of Appeals. The ADA’s interactive process requirement is a critical protection that ensures employers make decisions based on dialogue and facts, not assumptions,” said plaintiff’s attorney, Andrew Rozynski, of Eisenberg & Baum.
