The defendant-appellees argued that the plaintiff’s interpretation of Georgia’s Civil Practice Act “Would essentially gut every single statute of limitations that there is if the plaintiff were to elicit testimony that the defendant was kind of expecting to get sued, but didn’t.”
The defendant-appellees argued that the plaintiff’s interpretation of Georgia’s Civil Practice Act “Would essentially gut every single statute of limitations that there is if the plaintiff were to elicit testimony that the defendant was kind of expecting to get sued, but didn’t.”