“Here, the grantees assert a non-statutory right to vindicate separation-of-powers principles but they are foreclosed from doing so” by Supreme Court precedent, the appellate court stated. “[P]laintiffs would otherwise be able to avoid statutory limits on review by reframing any alleged statutory violation by the President as a constitutional one.
“Here, the grantees assert a non-statutory right to vindicate separation-of-powers principles but they are foreclosed from doing so” by Supreme Court precedent, the appellate court stated. “[P]laintiffs would otherwise be able to avoid statutory limits on review by reframing any alleged statutory violation by the President as a constitutional one.
