data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7e8b2/7e8b2450fbc63e0cf04103f53074804cdc01aa87" alt="Elite Litigation Boutique Doing Its Part To Protect Whistleblowers 1 GettyImages 1466789327"
Ed. Note: Welcome to our daily feature Trivia Question of the Day!
Which elite litigation boutique law firm won a TRO keeping client Hampton Dellinger in his role as Special Counsel as the primary protector of whistleblowers?
Hint: Judge Amy Berman Jackson wrote in the order, “The effort by the White House to terminate the Special Counsel without identifying any cause plainly contravenes the statute, which states, ‘[t]he Special Counsel may be removed by the President only for inefficiency, neglect of duty, or malfeasance in office.’”
See the answer on the next page.
The post Elite Litigation Boutique Doing Its Part To Protect Whistleblowers appeared first on Above the Law.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7e8b2/7e8b2450fbc63e0cf04103f53074804cdc01aa87" alt="Elite Litigation Boutique Doing Its Part To Protect Whistleblowers 2 GettyImages 1466789327"
Ed. Note: Welcome to our daily feature Trivia Question of the Day!
Which elite litigation boutique law firm won a TRO keeping client Hampton Dellinger in his role as Special Counsel as the primary protector of whistleblowers?
Hint: Judge Amy Berman Jackson wrote in the order, “The effort by the White House to terminate the Special Counsel without identifying any cause plainly contravenes the statute, which states, ‘[t]he Special Counsel may be removed by the President only for inefficiency, neglect of duty, or malfeasance in office.’”
See the answer on the next page.