“From these facts, it is reasonable to infer that Bowe’s conduct was not merely negligent or misguided, but driven by actual malice. That is, when taking the allegations as true, it can be inferred that Bowe, like Muster, acted out in a spiteful, malignant purpose wholly unrelated to the court’s legitimate interests,” wrote Associate Justice Serge Georges Jr.
“From these facts, it is reasonable to infer that Bowe’s conduct was not merely negligent or misguided, but driven by actual malice. That is, when taking the allegations as true, it can be inferred that Bowe, like Muster, acted out in a spiteful, malignant purpose wholly unrelated to the court’s legitimate interests,” wrote Associate Justice Serge Georges Jr.
