Ed. Note: A weekly roundup of just a few items from Howard Bashman’s How Appealing blog, the Web’s first blog devoted to appellate litigation. Check out these stories and more at How Appealing.
“Trump comes close to the red line of openly defying judges, experts say; Faced with judges’ orders to block certain initiatives, the Trump administration has found ways to tell courts it still has the authority to act”: Justin Jouvenal, Leo Sands, and Ann E. Marimow of The Washington Post have this report.
“Judge asks if ‘unadulterated animus’ is driving Trump’s trans troop ban; In a sometimes-fiery hearing, a federal judge said that the Trump administration’s assertion that troops’ pronouns are harming military readiness is ‘frankly ridiculous’”: Casey Parks of The Washington Post has this report.
“Pivotal Trial Begins in Texas: Will Johnson & Johnson’s Third Talc Bankruptcy Survive? U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Christopher Lopez heard opening statements on Tuesday in a two-week trial over the fate of Johnson & Johnson’s third talcum powder bankruptcy.” Amanda Bronstad has this report online at Texas Lawyer.
“Justice Dept. Official Suggests That Aiding Trump Outweighs Prosecutions; Emil Bove III, the acting deputy attorney general, tried to persuade a judge to let him drop a corruption case against Mayor Eric Adams; He said the mayor was crucial to the president’s agenda”: Jonah E. Bromwich, Benjamin Weiser, Hurubie Meko, and William K. Rashbaum of The New York Times have this report.
“Missouri Clinics Resume Abortions, Following Abortion Rights Referendum; Abortion opponents had tried to block, or severely limit, the procedure, against the will of voters who in November enshrined abortion rights in the state constitution”: Kate Zernike of The New York Times has this report.
“Lawyer asks federal judge to recuse himself due to pronoun policy in courtroom; Judge S. Kato Crews is one of six judges on Colorado’s US District Court requiring parties to use others’ ‘applicable pronouns’ in their courtrooms”: Michael Karlik of Colorado Politics has this report.
The post How Appealing Weekly Roundup appeared first on Above the Law.
Ed. Note: A weekly roundup of just a few items from Howard Bashman’s How Appealing blog, the Web’s first blog devoted to appellate litigation. Check out these stories and more at How Appealing.
“Trump comes close to the red line of openly defying judges, experts say; Faced with judges’ orders to block certain initiatives, the Trump administration has found ways to tell courts it still has the authority to act”: Justin Jouvenal, Leo Sands, and Ann E. Marimow of The Washington Post have this report.
“Judge asks if ‘unadulterated animus’ is driving Trump’s trans troop ban; In a sometimes-fiery hearing, a federal judge said that the Trump administration’s assertion that troops’ pronouns are harming military readiness is ‘frankly ridiculous’”: Casey Parks of The Washington Post has this report.
“Pivotal Trial Begins in Texas: Will Johnson & Johnson’s Third Talc Bankruptcy Survive? U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Christopher Lopez heard opening statements on Tuesday in a two-week trial over the fate of Johnson & Johnson’s third talcum powder bankruptcy.” Amanda Bronstad has this report online at Texas Lawyer.
“Justice Dept. Official Suggests That Aiding Trump Outweighs Prosecutions; Emil Bove III, the acting deputy attorney general, tried to persuade a judge to let him drop a corruption case against Mayor Eric Adams; He said the mayor was crucial to the president’s agenda”: Jonah E. Bromwich, Benjamin Weiser, Hurubie Meko, and William K. Rashbaum of The New York Times have this report.
“Missouri Clinics Resume Abortions, Following Abortion Rights Referendum; Abortion opponents had tried to block, or severely limit, the procedure, against the will of voters who in November enshrined abortion rights in the state constitution”: Kate Zernike of The New York Times has this report.
“Lawyer asks federal judge to recuse himself due to pronoun policy in courtroom; Judge S. Kato Crews is one of six judges on Colorado’s US District Court requiring parties to use others’ ‘applicable pronouns’ in their courtrooms”: Michael Karlik of Colorado Politics has this report.
